[stir] Question about "RPH Types" RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-rph-00.txt
"Gunn, Janet P" <Janet.Gunn@csra.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <Janet.Gunn@csra.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBE8131D60 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hx3HPP6ks3Cj for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailport8.csra.com (mailport8.csra.com [131.131.83.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E96131D67 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csrrdu1exm023.corp.csra.com (HELO mail.csra.com) ([10.176.90.33]) by mailport8.csra.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 05 Jul 2017 11:41:02 -0400
Received: from CSRRDU1EXM025.corp.csra.com (10.176.90.35) by CSRRDU1EXM024.corp.csra.com (10.176.90.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:41:00 -0400
Received: from CSRRDU1EXM025.corp.csra.com ([10.176.90.35]) by CSRRDU1EXM025.corp.csra.com ([10.176.90.35]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:41:00 -0400
From: "Gunn, Janet P" <Janet.Gunn@csra.com>
To: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question about "RPH Types" RE: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-rph-00.txt
Thread-Index: AdL1pME3zeSSCrETQUm9yPng1ME8MA==
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:41:00 +0000
Message-ID: <c5a9a3da0d2a4824a8e3a6ec2564aec4@CSRRDU1EXM025.corp.csra.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.76.253.110]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/sz6_sRIcn1nhBWLRuVlBIw77ii0>
Subject: [stir] Question about "RPH Types" RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-rph-00.txt
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:41:07 -0000
I am having some difficulty understanding "RPH types" Section 5 says " A new IANA registry has been defined to hold potential values of the "rph" array; see Section 8.3." <there is no Section 8.3. This may be a typo for 6.2> Within Section 6, IANA considerations, Section 6.2 says: " This document requests that the IANA create a new registry for PASSporT RPH types. Registration of new PASSporT RPH types shall be under the specification required policy. This registry is to be initially populated with a single value for "namespace" which is specified in [RFCThis]." But I can find no reference to "RPH types" in the rest of the document. Nor can I find any other references to "rph" array. And I can't find anything that indicates what this a single value for "namespace" is. So I am not sure how it/they will be used. Some additional description and clarification would be useful. Janet -----Original Message----- From: stir [mailto:stir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 7:42 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: stir@ietf.org Subject: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-rph-00.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited of the IETF. Title : PASSporT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization Authors : Ray P. Singh Martin Dolly Subir Das An Nguyen Filename : draft-ietf-stir-rph-00.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2017-06-30 Abstract: This document extends the PASSporT object to convey cryptographically-signed assertions of authorization for communications 'Resource-Priority'. It extends PASSporT to allow cryptographic-signing of the SIP 'Resource-Priority" header field which is used for communications resource prioritization. It also describes how the PASSPorT extension is used in SIP signaling to convey assertions of authorization of the information in the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-rph/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stir-rph-00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-rph-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ stir mailing list stir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir This electronic message transmission contains information from CSRA that may be attorney-client privileged, proprietary or confidential. The information in this message is intended only for use by the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you believe you have received this message in error, please contact me immediately and be aware that any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. NOTE: Regardless of content, this email shall not operate to bind CSRA to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of email for such purpose.
- [stir] Question about "RPH Types" RE: I-D Action:… Gunn, Janet P
- Re: [stir] Question about "RPH Types" RE: I-D Act… Singh, Ray P