[stir] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-stir-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 06 December 2021 10:40 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: stir-chairs@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <163878719975.9281.18282712426001801172@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 02:40:00 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/teNaFaMDAi8wYvTdXPF-dSBW7tw>
Subject: [stir] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-stir-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-stir-01-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-stir/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am just puzzled by the 3rd and 4th paragraph as they seem to indicate that
the work has yet to be done, STIR specifications written, ... E.g., this
sentence uses future tense: "the working group will specify and maintain a SIP
header-based mechanism". AFAIK, STIR WG has already published 12 RFC so it has
a solid foundation.

This does not prevent re-chartering of course.

[stir] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker