Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a Notice of Consultation on robocalls spoofing STIR/SHAKEN
Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.co.uk> Sat, 04 February 2017 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.co.uk>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F56129AA6; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 05:50:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2XrOFJylcdO; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 05:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uk-www1.yaanatech.uk (uk-www1.yaanatech.uk [46.20.116.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD21A129650; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 05:50:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-70-106-242-209.clppva.fios.verizon.net [70.106.242.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uk-www1.yaanatech.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3513B54059C; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:50:03 +0000 (GMT)
References: <7F3DCD21-1085-4961-82D7-CE12DB308305@shockey.us> <a9417cde-33d4-3da2-ad2a-5b83bd81701f@yaanatech.co.uk> <74394dc8-5a61-cb8f-eb9d-98b499256326@dcrocker.net> <5fbc40d2-51f5-7073-f99a-488cd53f8fce@yaanatech.co.uk> <974c2333-aef5-1c93-744c-58dbaaa20ca9@dcrocker.net> <286e60eb-baa3-c4ec-6c32-43e217713310@yaanatech.co.uk> <3d4c18f8-f08c-8ce9-6e37-5498069ae5df@bbiw.net> <4B1956260CD29F4A9622F00322FE0531012CFB5151B1@BOBO1A.bobotek.net>
To: Alex Bobotek <alex@bobotek.net>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.co.uk>
Organization: Yaana Ltd
Message-ID: <bee03501-accf-8bb4-b9d9-06f4cb494045@yaanatech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 08:50:02 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B1956260CD29F4A9622F00322FE0531012CFB5151B1@BOBO1A.bobotek.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D78843DFB546B282D6ADAE9D"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/uzbxRudgnzgc04bSMFsbjML3mr8>
Subject: Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a Notice of Consultation on robocalls spoofing STIR/SHAKEN
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.co.uk
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 13:50:07 -0000
Alex, Thanks for the reflective note. My remarks were directed at the CRTC Call for comments which was circulated on this list. I had four points to make: 1) the incorporation into law of technical specifications such as the STIR/SHAKEN by designated standards bodies is ill advised, 2) the FCC's recent activism in this regard seem likely to change, 3) there are alternative platforms emerging that seem more promising, and 4) the adoption of STIR/SHAKEN is unlikely to be useful in dealing with what is basically a traffic management issue among carriers and customers. Having been in an out of local, national, and international regulatory bodies over the past 50 years, there is one maxim that served those bodies well - avoid incorporating specific technical "fixes" proffered by standards bodies into regulations. Anointing those bodies gives them de facto regulatory authority and they tend to become more closed, ossified, and manipulated over time, and innovation gets stifled as a result. Regarding the FCC, one has only to turn on the news or visit its site to realize that its role and activities are significantly changing, heading in the other direction of regulatory intervention into the industry management of its own affairs. The telecom industry would be now foolish to paradoxically argue against own interests to "regulate me." New innovative platforms can in part or whole serve as more efficient and more flexible alternatives to STIR/SHAKEN. These include not only blockchain, but also AI techniques pioneered by GeorgiaTech and spun out as Pindrop and apparently now nine other competitors. CRTC should not stifle the innovation that has emerged in this sector. Even if STIR/SHAKEN were able to be imposed at the national level by regulatory fiat, it is unlikely to be a global solution, nor one that even addresses and adapts to the changing network management demands faced by carriers among their diverse customer sets. They are entirely capable of devising and implementing their own solutions and coordinating them through global industry bodies such as the GSMA. To the extent some kind of local national support centre is needed, the UK NICC model might be useful. best, tony
- [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a Notice… Richard Shockey
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Dave Crocker
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Dave Crocker
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Richard Shockey
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] [sipcore] The Canadian Regulator has i… Richard Shockey
- Re: [stir] [sipcore] The Canadian Regulator has i… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] [sipcore] The Canadian Regulator has i… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Dave Crocker
- Re: [stir] [sipcore] The Canadian Regulator has i… Dave Crocker
- Re: [stir] [sipcore] The Canadian Regulator has i… Richard Shockey
- Re: [stir] [sipcore] The Canadian Regulator has i… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Alex Bobotek
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Gorman, Pierce A [CTO]
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Richard Shockey
- Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a No… Tony Rutkowski
- [stir] Availability of SHAKEN Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] Availability of SHAKEN Mary Barnes
- [stir] ETSI TC CYBER overview of recent activities Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [stir] Availability of SHAKEN Richard Shockey