[stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who follow this kind of stuff.
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 08 October 2025 01:14 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: stir@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: stir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185936F10E6D for <stir@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trxdR0P5gCOW for <stir@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384E86F10E3A for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-782a77b5ec7so5841492b3a.1 for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2025 18:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1759886058; x=1760490858; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VpUtQ9HC7WS5n4ReD8QFMkT9uqlgX/D9w4TdX982njc=; b=JrtBROisr+IFMfGspAVTFwUiC0bd55wlEjJDxTZVmGqYa5dnYGvfejL8uWPhvTZY0D BLawF0VYvHtiOhsY11fNNodPAi9OLmmGKBN0yJMcvqPm1k0DWL64LG+48YkkEj+yuSUW zp6c02gVj7nZrX5MVNzM2MrUeL20wtVJvJpNo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759886058; x=1760490858; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=VpUtQ9HC7WS5n4ReD8QFMkT9uqlgX/D9w4TdX982njc=; b=MtDVewMVFAh4CtzrsxptBwvmt0OedYbajODK8LPyExgmICSy9yD1tZ2jBCNzkvxWIo LqUd0aQSr5ex+Wy0RQ0PDfmzK+qxIV4NdRbTKTgfOau/lDTX/lkwLECftxkIFV5DoDMK PzYRrIyHRcEpNNfus69azz1s0jrCYz6z0eW2ST0bhnZX8/qnNpr+8xs4jWBMTNI0fz+Z 3uVuW4Yv1etoP9XDVzWb4CACqt7+eI/GFRt+jN7gyUMWPmkx8Ord57RanPix4879ab15 wgCYyRbmv/kuT4aZN85yslOkuVKlcdYS35sNeK8pZyB0hYQXV8mziyu2AE+wgv92gyBI jZ7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxKpTpsHd0mX8DHvY4avewNAH9jJnMa+L4dhYVizVhpJ1MQS+pO 0Kc3h34gdLw/YUvzVyD1e30uwfDRt0XD/smr0co7f8EtqbhEqa1tfGwFXhd29K3yEy+YR+EPSGw 0muAmC18bvS1Cifzkauk0NIdk4RnB0/DrS8QliUf1XQ==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv5D1B5VVEI43fJUmHxUog/+hR9O05RkyYz45dEYHAPUgzy9+29N8GoPSkjrYu ZlFChEG00KrfFVVuiHjyNuzRcDkUjyGMWVD7FMQ3WtItJGCzwRKoBNmc3S29lbrQRBPfDIpDaIY jXO1EPmxzfiqfUaX2vAHULz9PUS+CgGBsGbrA+Gu4zluuDjW8nB98wv6E73g88S6Czh4KBFYvTz aPnuN+0Lwd7s9z+ZxbYnF9RR0fMGyeoZNE8rWjk6uJtVKz1+ZU6FBGM86Yl+zVw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHK7B+0/R8gf0SbVu5MBUKzEhxW4+tQpljPdG6RAClgXt0Z0FYsni85d03IQSGWRoQfetZY3KRNfj7fVIC3L9g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3383:b0:32b:6f1c:9962 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-32da81853e2mr1866212637.8.1759886057978; Tue, 07 Oct 2025 18:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 01:14:16 +0000
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:14:13 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.8.3)
References: <BDE3EA55-E1F7-4575-9251-874BD0CEFD37@shockey.us> <CAD5OKxsXX-+QcJCN_ymdO1XC_jEtbUcZq81oiPo7+DOnV2R+VA@mail.gmail.com> <49BE4C2A-DC24-4445-A296-A8E26689DA2A@shockey.us> <CAD5OKxvVwVyeF1AYY72rCEhFNkYuxB=D8EOt+1iDSB5LyMLwLQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR13MB406762742DB674A370055AAB9AE1A@DM6PR13MB4067.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR13MB406762742DB674A370055AAB9AE1A@DM6PR13MB4067.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 01:14:16 +0000
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWAmMQLl8koEtdRHpFU-L3HbbMOSlwaewgwQ_AyiC4Kp93FNZW8OuSF32WA
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuh9d8cjBa6SZgxRxN0_XeZSNOhCqyFR1Rg_sza=ezJeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brett Nemeroff <Brett.Nemeroff@numeracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="00000000000054ea5b06409b6746"
Message-ID-Hash: IWQ5YUUXIWAQQ5THXE6OL3MHOWXBQ6R4
X-Message-ID-Hash: IWQ5YUUXIWAQQ5THXE6OL3MHOWXBQ6R4
X-MailFrom: tbray@textuality.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-stir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who follow this kind of stuff.
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/vkEx529Ws2hBj032xKnyuct-qLs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:stir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:stir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stir-leave@ietf.org>
You guys are speaking in Sumerian :) Is this something that any particular chunk of the IETF (or of the industry or of society) should worry about? -T On Oct 7, 2025 at 5:42:23 PM, Brett Nemeroff <Brett.Nemeroff@numeracle.com> wrote: > Hello Roman, > > In my opinion, US Carriers are unlikely to accept vanilla RCD data because > of the lack of defined KYC. RCD is a very good vehicle for delivering the > RCD, but it depends upon implicit trust of the originating service > provider. “Vanilla” RCD offered like this to terminating service providers > gives no assurance to the terminating service provider that the originator > performed any specific KYC. > > CTIA’s BCID is based on RCD but details an ecosystem with specific KYC > requirements. Participating in this ecosystem will allow for the delivery > and native presentation of RCD. > > It’s worth noting that without a defined ecosystem for RCD such as BCID, > RCD provides little (trust) benefit over traditional CNAM other than the > fingerprints of the originating service provider for enforcement purposes. > > -Brett > > > > Brett Nemeroff > VP of Engineering - Voice > Brett.Nemeroff@numeracle.com <%7BE-mail%7D> | 1-512-203-3884 > > [image: Logo.png] <https://www.numeracle.com/> > > Empowering Calls with > Identity Management > <https://www.numeracle.com/insights/entity-identity-management-to-empower-your-calls> > > > > * CONFIDENTIAL From: *Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7:24 PM > *To: *Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> > *Cc: *IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, art@ietf.org <art@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow this kind of > stuff. > > You don't often get email from roman@telurix.com. Learn why this is > important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> > In my day job, I see a lot of robocalls coming through the LEC local > switches as TDM, as local re-origination with spoofed ANI. > > I would also love to sign Rich Call Data with my SPC token and not have > wireless carriers discard this data. If I provide the information about my > customer, I am unsure why I need to pay someone else to sign this > information. > _____________ > Roman Shpount > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 8:11 PM Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> wrote: > > > > It wont . You mean the legacy TDM/SS7 crap…this is the beginning of > mandating all SIP in the US realtime US voice network as the British have > done. > > > > I would not want to own a Tandem Access network. > > > > The US industry is pretty clear on this. You only need to read the FCC > 17-97 docket at the FCC ECFS website to understand where the players > actually are. > > > > This again is my day job. > > > > > > Richard Shockey > > Shockey Consulting LLC > > Chairman of the Board SIP Forum > > www.shockey.us > > www.sipforum.org > > richard<at>shockey.us > > Skype-Linkedin-Facebook –Twitter rshockey101 > > PSTN +1 703-593-2683 > > > > > > *From: *Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7:37 PM > *To: *Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> > *Cc: *IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, <art@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[art] Re: [stir] For those of you who follow this kind of > stuff. > > > > How would this work with PSTN links? > > _____________ > Roman Shpount > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 6:59 PM Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> wrote: > > > The United States government is going to mandate Rich Call Data in the > network. > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-415059A1.pdf > > > Richard Shockey > Shockey Consulting LLC > Chairman of the Board SIP Forum > www.shockey.us <http://www.shockey.us> > www.sipforum.org > > richard<at>shockey.us > Skype-Linkedin-Facebook –Twitter rshockey101 > PSTN +1 703-593-2683 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > stir mailing list -- stir@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to stir-leave@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ art mailing list -- > art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to art-leave@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > art mailing list -- art@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to art-leave@ietf.org >
- [stir] For those of you who follow this kind of s… Richard Shockey
- [stir] Re: For those of you who follow this kind … Roman Shpount
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Richard Shockey
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Roman Shpount
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Brett Nemeroff
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Tim Bray
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Brett Nemeroff
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Richard Shockey
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Roman Shpount
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Chris Wendt
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Pierce Gorman
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Brett Nemeroff
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Roman Shpount
- [stir] Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Pierce Gorman
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Pierce Gorman
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Andy Newton
- [stir] Re: Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Daniel Hardman
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Roman Shpount
- [stir] Re: Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Russ Housley
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Richard Shockey
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Roman Shpount
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Henning Schulzrinne
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Roman Shpount
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Pierce Gorman
- [stir] Re: Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Orie
- [stir] Re: Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Peterson, Jon
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Brett Nemeroff
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: Re: Re: For those of you who… Richard Shockey
- [stir] Re: Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Daniel Hardman
- [stir] Re: [art] Re: For those of you who follow … Chris Wendt
- [stir] Re: Verifiable Voice Protocol (VVP) Brett Nemeroff