IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] AD Review: draft-ietf-stir-rph-02 - authority to assert the callers identity assumed?

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 12 March 2018 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B190126CF9 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id leh7zZduwWR0 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF7E1200C1 for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2CL4ehS014875 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:04:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C135F8E@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <CAFb8J8pa9_q-pQbDy7ACg-JnFurOCJALYUdBzD6C-P1rJHO52g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C153849@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <0981B4BB-98C6-4DBB-8E13-A702944ACC3E@gmail.com> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365668A592A9@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <C1A3E161FB009440ABA575570A60CD9C9A5FED72@rrc-ats-exmb2.ats.atsinnovate.com> <D3F011C9-7E23-4BBF-8D9F-E7C2776A4317@ericsson.com> <VI1PR0701MB2304239864FCD877776690D8C7FE0@VI1PR0701MB2304.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365668A5B136@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <60DBC9ED-9ECD-45D6-AE8C-A8259630BE3B@vigilsec.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <3337859f-24db-d02c-dd4c-6c00fd9effc1@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:04:35 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <60DBC9ED-9ECD-45D6-AE8C-A8259630BE3B@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/wE6mgpCx1xfoKg_c3vExE71gGYY>
Subject: Re: [stir] AD Review: draft-ietf-stir-rph-02 - authority to assert the callers identity assumed?
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 21:04:42 -0000

On 3/9/18 3:02 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Revision -03 was posted on Feb. 1st.  Can you tell us whether yout 
> comments have been addresses with this revision?

The document is ready. I indicated in the tracker: "Given the excessive 
number of documents currently in last call, I'm going to wait last call 
on this document until after London, to give the last-call queue some 
time to drain." I thought these comments were automatically sent by the 
tools to the working group mailing list, but apparently they aren't. 
Sorry for the confusion.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email