[stir] Comments on draft-peterson-acme-telephone-00.txt
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 06:46 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F1E1299A2 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6fWndYJ62BP for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3951A129608 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id i145so31098199ywg.2 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uJF8mMiJNzPgseHcLo10JyLrfhgSK73AfEw8XhHc+V0=; b=0WriwTcihdJ6p3AfzBv5yXmPhhhjZyBY5oF6YR1pJ0kjsco4Ozo2hvu6cyno/qf7TJ mvUkRZFndOOLS0ctiXhKdfAqp9CPwmPHhLJsdVz6cA8b6uUh/JdeqkGossz5YXMFjtRy pc6rdXjosAx7CLUESvLr+8pUM1NahWjAbJjej0Db1QoNq4e1H+qRoHWcqDx+TNe12iPT 6wfbOmrHEaGOPT9L7J0MWbJX40o2hSUrjLV+7v5C57+VJ/ADPCM5guR2JJ6qzK86xHi7 itEH9pQ7M5Av7AKqFwVOvSN3Ie6q5SppIT1PoYy6SeOomT3FCsQ9HHmh15PjOq+9xk5p PdFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uJF8mMiJNzPgseHcLo10JyLrfhgSK73AfEw8XhHc+V0=; b=BuSYDZffM0s0vJUs0HsBAasdwNYQJ0Do8Wr5BEDs8oYqktuK9OUGf9cOikr7eYn4Hp 7ArvNPFspskWqciMwkUSCaP+dEIIX3BulJna+BU3T29qDMt0aRXT3URLCyT2KeudRfdi cP9Qsv7fSQumVYRbKOmPH6Xp5OKm4gS1RT47mncLQGUo/8U2D8EpFnvgxvLla/BjDlyO 72ChTMvUqMxd3LYarRZbCvVBGYb4N3wmp2C6Cp/7nn+skCHYHwTzxubXaTaTh5mZ/gsd F7gf7LMJ0OgrdHfhXQLnz1skMT3mr5jJV05X46maHmtG6o9HefhhDgfuRUnplVU2H5Og MsgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcIKiS6wWtCK3JjNAQHwRdujZ87HSVYlvgheYEh9D+iWEHIRYxZDgFftE9YFi7iHTFYawwt0YSgoJw3nQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.53.194 with SMTP id c185mr6265658ywa.205.1478933201400; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.159.141 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:46:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPWLJ3_MpTbFhAOioUipCtKwJz_V+q5kJT0PY-+4VjjEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114214781dea99054114f899"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/x9koY8_6AhsZ1dQWKElJUpibIBw>
Subject: [stir] Comments on draft-peterson-acme-telephone-00.txt
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 06:46:44 -0000
SUBSTANTIVE Should "tn" be "tel"? This URL is intended to be opened in a web browser so that the user can have an interaction with the CA; it is not sufficient for the client to simply send a GET request to the URL. I don't understand what this text means. How does it interact with automatic validation? This text about exactly what the semantics of the SMS validation are should take into account the points raised by Karthik Bhargavan at: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/current/msg00996.html EDITORIAL Abstract: telephonoe -> telephone
- [stir] Comments on draft-peterson-acme-telephone-… Eric Rescorla