IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] current draft charter - ENUM and databases

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1830621F9A12 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5T9l4L23aKzO for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E9521F91A5 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5JDf8Sp016652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:41:11 -0700
Message-ID: <51C1B4E3.6080209@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:40:51 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com>
References: <8C77C05D-6ED2-4429-BF1C-72082F4ADE76@oracle.com> <E3FAB1F4F41F3A45B287E8D9C53522FD472CEA44@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com> <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3A03DEDDE@ex2k10mb2.corp.yaanatech.com>
In-Reply-To: <00C069FD01E0324C9FFCADF539701DB3A03DEDDE@ex2k10mb2.corp.yaanatech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [stir] current draft charter - ENUM and databases
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:41:17 -0000

On 6/19/2013 6:37 AM, Michael Hammer wrote:
> Should we focus on E.164 first, email-style names second, and the
> interworking of the two third?


That does sound pragmatic, doesn't it?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email