Re: [stir] wglc comment: intended status of draft-ietf-stir-oob-04

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 12 April 2019 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C8F1201A5 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zW13qA8P8nF0 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5F61206C5 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D54300AA5 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:14:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DQZXPmYFmsJp for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:14:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 422683004C7; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:14:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <e5770116-e2e4-ba23-ab7c-746e454120c9@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:32:52 -0400
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B5DB3489-E405-44D1-A6DE-A275EC883784@vigilsec.com>
References: <e5770116-e2e4-ba23-ab7c-746e454120c9@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/yn0MWQwJqPWRR0Hr3WUVT3ledmI>
Subject: Re: [stir] wglc comment: intended status of draft-ietf-stir-oob-04
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:32:56 -0000

> I recall agreement that this would be published as Informational, rather than PS.

Yes, that was agreed in Montreal if memory serves.  The minutes do not reflect that point, but they do reflect the decision to publishe the architecture/framework and not a protocol document.

Russ