Re: [stir] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-stir-oob-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 04 December 2019 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F757120971; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:03:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HmLp-k7oEWnd; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F29512004C; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.17.10.6] (77.0.32.70.hosted.by.gigenet.com [70.32.0.77] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xB4L34sk019129 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:03:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1575493386; bh=eUjKgtGtTKm7dmRSOco5vL4FKkjnZzA7TT6HYDVbR7Q=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=qOj5dv3+Oym40Wcn8b2gi8/RPrLSw5cj+ru0sX1wpYVctQscUhwRPbyMhJOM8snGS WkfFLSNgcue1492ekd6FM969g8cCR2rA30gdBSoHlqPys7+6BuE1mZ5ojB6XPjmKL+ 2WGwCpiRECmGLeDpLZp4QvAzdEhBV4BqH2aAN974=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 77.0.32.70.hosted.by.gigenet.com [70.32.0.77] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.17.10.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <40d442d0-0225-945e-9f7b-d2ba936a3152@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 16:03:03 -0500
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-stir-oob@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org, stir-chairs@ietf.org, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <652D6A74-80C5-4719-9165-F5A84508B812@nostrum.com>
References: <157549028519.11105.10460597742514712129.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <40d442d0-0225-945e-9f7b-d2ba936a3152@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/yv9j0UtoVlxRQDudEgOaBM-DA3Y>
Subject: Re: [stir] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-stir-oob-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 21:03:11 -0000


> On Dec 4, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/4/19 2:11 PM, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
>> I understand why this document has been useful for the WG to discuss, but I'm
>> unclear on its lasting value as an RFC, especially with a number of open issues
>> of possible different directions under consideration that are listed in the
>> draft.
> 
> 
> The missing piece of the puzzle here may be that there are external groups who work on call spam abatement. See, in particular, the SHAKEN solution developed by ATIS on top of the STIR work. So there is a high chance that this document will serve as useful input to concrete external efforts. Publishing it as an RFC makes it more reasonably citable by such external entities.

Along those lines: I’m currently at the SIPNOC conference in Washington. A large number of attendees have shown interest in STIR OOB. Most of these are not people who would ordinarily participate in the IETF. Some are participants in the IP-NNI task force (The ATIS group Adam mentioned). I think this draft will be useful in helping them frame their thinking. I’m not sure other methods of publication would reach that audience as well.

Ben.

> 
> /a
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir