[Storagesync] 回复: Re: recent issues discussed (plain text)

["Fei Song" <[e-mail]>]

Dear Xiaowei,

Very good suggestion and link. Adding speed into efficiency or treat it individually, what is your opinion?


--------------
Fei Song
>
>hi，
>End users may be more concerned about the improvement of the upload rate. According to the report in"http://testmyiphone.com",  the average downstream throughput is more than 4490 Kbps, the average upstream throughput is only about 869 Kbps.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Here is the latest version. Please email me if anything is missed:
>1.The design targets of WebDAV, rsync and other existing approaches?
>2.The potential use cases of ISS, such as client/server, git-like pattern, svn, etc.
>3.The efficiency improvements might be the second goal for standardizing ISS protocol
>4.CORS headers on storage sync APIs
>5.What is needed for the ISS: a sync protocol or a generalized API
>6.remoteStorage draft discussion
>  a)relationship vs WebDAV
>  b)MOVE action (synchronization) should be added or not
>  c)Beside web browser, desktop apps (by hacking way)
>  d)comics of new standard
>  e)etag issues vs metadata
>    i.is mainly for identifying whether a document is changed or not
>    ii.is easy to implement than that of WebDAV sync protocol or not
>    iii.the metadata file contains all etags for all files at both client and server side or not
>  f)the distributed peer model (no server) and C/S mode
>  g)a fancy example (with pics) of OfflineIMAP’s sync process in following URL
>
>
>
>