Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting - WebEx

Tom Talpey <ttalpey@microsoft.com> Wed, 03 March 2010 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ttalpey@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942213A8A0B for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:55:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osdpVpO8ZtnB for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2E63A8C8E for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:55:23 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC118.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.9.167]) by TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.86.9]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:55:07 -0800
From: Tom Talpey <ttalpey@microsoft.com>
To: "storm@ietf.org" <storm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Anaheim meeting - WebEx
Thread-Index: AQHKum4N60qMMgFOuUCx6MBDD+fXy5HfhC0w
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 02:55:05 +0000
Message-ID: <F83812DF4B59B9499C1BC978336D9174247F1404@TK5EX14MBXC118.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB0188576D@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com><02cd01caa5c0$43047570$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB019D3F7E@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB01D1DF76@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB01D1DF76@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting - WebEx
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:55:27 -0000

And for those in attendance, follow the arrow on this handy url! :-)

http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/77/venue/?room=redondo

Tom.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Black_David@emc.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:07 PM
> To: storm@ietf.org
> Subject: [storm] Anaheim meeting - WebEx
> 
> There will be WebEx for the storm meeting in Anaheim.  The meeting is
> Thursday, March 25 @ 9am.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Black_David@emc.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:05 AM
> > To: ietfdbh@comcast.net; storm@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> >
> > Yes, I've sent in the request.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --David
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of David Harrington
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:34 PM
> > > To: Black, David; storm@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > are you requesting webex support for the meeting?
> > >
> > > David Harrington
> > > dbharrington@comcast.net
> > > ietfdbh@comcast.net
> > > dharrington@huawei.com
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org]
> > > > On Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:46 PM
> > > > To: storm@ietf.org
> > > > Subject: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> > > > Importance: High
> > > >
> > > > First, I apologize for the delay in getting this note out.  I
> > > > had every intent of getting storm WG activity going
> > > > immediately after the winter holidays, and then January
> > > > started with a bang at my day job and never let up.  For some
> > > > reason, the people who pay my salary expect me to do useful
> > > > work for them ...
> > > >
> > > > Announcement: The storm WG will meet during the IETF meeting
> > > > week, March 21-26 in Anaheim, CA.  I've asked for a 1.5 hour
> > > > meeting slot; we'll see what we get.  So, what are we going
> > > > to work on there?  Glad you asked ...
> > > >
> > > > The storm WG charter anticipates seven drafts:
> > > > 	- 5 protocol drafts: iSCSI consolidation, iSCSI update
> > > > (SAM features),
> > > > 		combined iFCP/FCIP update, RDDP MPA update, and
> > > > iSER update, plus
> > > > 	- 2 MIB updates, to the iFCP and iSCSI MIBs.
> > > > Five of these drafts have been submitted - your WG chairs
> > > > (Tom Talpey and I) are gently encouraging the authors of the
> > > > RDDP MPA update to submit the -00 version of that draft, and
> > > > we're holding off on the iSCSI MIB update draft until we have
> > > > a better idea of what will happen with the two iSCSI drafts
> > > > (the iSCSI MIB update depends not only on features added by
> > > > the iSCSI update draft, but also on features [if any] that
> > > > the WG decides to remove from the iSCSI consolidation draft).
> > > >
> > > > Here's the plan for the five drafts we have now:
> > > > - As his first official action as a WG chair, Tom (storm
> > > > co-chair) will start the WG last call on the iFCP/FCIP update
> > > > draft and the updated iFCP MIB shortly.  Tom will run this
> > > > last call because I'm the primary author/editor of that draft.
> > > > - The iSCSI-related drafts will be discussed in this
> > > > sequence: iSCSI update (SAM features), iSER, iSCSI
> > > > consolidation.  Please review and comment (to the list) on
> > > > the iSCSI update draft now:
> > > > 	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-00.txt
> > > > Discussion of the iSER draft will follow, and for the iSCSI
> > > > consolidation draft, please bring suggestions for what to
> > > > take out (because it's never been implemented) to the Anaheim
> > > > meeting, or post it to the list during the meeting week.
> > > >
> > > > That brings me to an important Reminder: Travel is NOT
> > > > REQUIRED to participate in the storm WG.  The intent is to
> > > > operate primarily via this mailing list, and anything that
> > > > happens in the Anaheim meeting will be posted to the list for
> > > > further comment and discussion before  any final decision or action.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your patience,
> > > > --David (storm WG co-chair)
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> > > > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > > > +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> > > > black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > storm mailing list
> > > > storm@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > storm mailing list
> > > storm@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > storm mailing list
> > storm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> storm mailing list
> storm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm