[storm] RDDP registries draft (and MPA peer connect draft) status

<david.black@emc.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE60921F8C6A for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.367, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAQEraIzWFem for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2847F21F8C69 for <storm@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI04.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.24]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p9JF9AiC022639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <storm@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:09:11 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.251]) by hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <storm@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:08:58 -0400
Received: from mxhub14.corp.emc.com (mxhub14.corp.emc.com [128.221.56.103]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p9JF8uvK011467 for <storm@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:08:56 -0400
Received: from mx14a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.78]) by mxhub14.corp.emc.com ([128.221.56.103]) with mapi; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:08:56 -0400
From: <david.black@emc.com>
To: <storm@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:08:54 -0400
Thread-Topic: RDDP registries draft (and MPA peer connect draft) status
Thread-Index: AcyOcQR9oRpaUusFSie+zqQvGZmtbg==
Message-ID: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058D073893@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058D073893MX14Acorpemcc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: [storm] RDDP registries draft (and MPA peer connect draft) status
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:09:14 -0000

The draft to establish the RDDP registries has been submitted, and should be posted soon.  I'm attaching a copy because the draft submission is currently held up by some sort of -00 approval process misfire in the IETF datatracker.

Many thanks to Mike Ko for doing the grunt work of copying all the values out of the existing RFCs on short notice - that probably saved about a month in getting the MPA peer connect draft approved and published.

The plan for the MPA peer connect draft is that a -08 version that responds to the IETF Last Call and IESG Evaluation comments should be submitted later this week.  That version will normatively reference the RDDP registries draft, so the expectation is that IESG approval for the -08 MPA peer connect draft will happen fairly quickly, but the RFC Editor will hold that draft (wait for Missing Reference) until the RDDP registries draft arrives.

The plan for the RDDP registries draft is that a storm WG Last Call will start almost immediately when the -00 version is posted.  That WG LC will run past the draft cutoff for Taipei, hence the most likely result is that a slightly revised version will be submitted get sent to our AD during the Taipei meeting week (Nov 13-19).

Thanks,
--David (storm WG co-chair)
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------