Re: [storm] Working Group Last Call on "iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates"

<Black_David@emc.com> Thu, 18 February 2010 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Black_David@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ECA3A8039 for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.298, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSDSBIR-UEh9 for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F9C28C0E9 for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.3.2/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id o1IJWEjx018674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:32:14 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (numailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.16]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:32:05 -0500
Received: from corpussmtp5.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp5.corp.emc.com [128.221.166.229]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id o1IJVxOc013134 for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:32:05 -0500
Received: from CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com ([10.254.89.201]) by corpussmtp5.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:31:14 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:31:12 -0500
Message-ID: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB01B2E514@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <F83812DF4B59B9499C1BC978336D917423DEE58E@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [storm] Working Group Last Call on "iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates"
Thread-Index: AcqlqUO5SU9n8ntQRVWEQEaaICI3uALJzY4A
References: <F83812DF4B59B9499C1BC978336D917423DEE58E@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
From: <Black_David@emc.com>
To: <storm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2010 19:31:14.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[EF1D9560:01CAB0D0]
X-EMM-EM: Active
Subject: Re: [storm] Working Group Last Call on "iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates"
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:30:33 -0000

In the interest of their being at least one Last Call comment, I reviewed my own draft ;-).

The second paragraph of the Introduction needs a concluding sentence to state that no change is being made to the IANA allocation of IP Protocol number 133 so that the reader who skipped the abstract doesn't have to go all the way down to section 4 to find out that nothing is being changed.

There we go, that's one comment ...

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------