Re: [storm] [nfsv4] [tsv-area] Application protocol for distributed storage

Wesley Leggette <wleggette@cleversafe.com> Sat, 16 January 2010 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <wleggette@cleversafe.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B923A69A7; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:16:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9N24tWERnOJ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p01c12o141.mxlogic.net (p01c12o141.mxlogic.net [208.65.145.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5803A6823; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [216.166.12.32] (EHLO p01c12o141.mxlogic.net) by p01c12o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.4.0-2) with ESMTP id 873115b4.bf1ebb90.31481.00-400.67455.p01c12o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from <wleggette@cleversafe.com>); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:16:40 -0700 (MST)
X-MXL-Hash: 4b5113780e5bcd04-6d2e3f50f76d0213eab4369a5b5ae0c8b4f51f92
Received: from unknown [216.166.12.32] (EHLO out001.collaborationhost.net) by p01c12o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.4.0-2) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id d63115b4.0.31456.00-016.67387.p01c12o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from <wleggette@cleversafe.com>); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:16:33 -0700 (MST)
X-MXL-Hash: 4b511371238f56dd-17d3962c5b5503134948664d182f4c41235be401
Received: from AUSP01VMBX09.collaborationhost.net ([10.2.8.161]) by AUSP01MHUB02.collaborationhost.net ([10.2.8.26]) with mapi; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:16:28 -0600
From: Wesley Leggette <wleggette@cleversafe.com>
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:16:27 -0600
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] [tsv-area] Application protocol for distributed storage
Thread-Index: AcqWMjJIKxU1zolAS1ittCdBrnWzDwAF1Rql
Message-ID: <C7766F8B.23E4A%wleggette@cleversafe.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100115221215.GJ1061@Sun.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010011101)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <wleggette@cleversafe.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [216.166.12.32]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=fRld3FbfVJQA:10 a=zbe46bahRtDx8aUBN1lPzQ==:17 ]
X-AnalysisOut: [a=cexIBkohAAAA:8 a=DbP1si6MMRqtshVqVg0A:9 a=mefgJzSDuhvzxi]
X-AnalysisOut: [EVeiJNzMPYXGkA:4 a=KdsN9ty_cgEA:10]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:29:25 -0800
Cc: "storm@ietf.org" <storm@ietf.org>, TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [storm] [nfsv4] [tsv-area] Application protocol for distributed storage
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:16:44 -0000

On 1/15/10 16:12, "Nicolas Williams" <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:51:39AM -0600, Wesley Leggette wrote:
>>>> When we are ready to submit something (it would be a submission which
>>>> documents what we have currently implemented) is there a working group that
>>>> would be appropriate, or should we just submit an I-D directly?
>>> 
>>> It's always easiest to submit an individual I-D first, then see where to
>>> place it, AFAICT.
>> 
>> Then we will do that for now, taking into account your other suggestions.
> 
> The process roughly goes like this:
> 
>  - Submit some individual submission Internet-Drafts (e.g.,
>    draft-leggette-my-distributed-storage-protocol-00).
> 
>  - Request a BoF meeting at the next IETF meeting.

I've noticed that IETF 77 will be held in California in March. We'd be
interested in requesting a meeting for that, but since the proposal request
deadline is the 25th, it seems unlikely that we can have a I-D submitted by
then. Can one request a BOF meeting without a prior submission (assuming we
would finish our submission before March)?

Wesley Leggette
Cleversafe, Inc.