Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity

<Black_David@emc.com> Tue, 09 February 2010 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Black_David@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F543A71DF for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:04:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEJswJ5mUD-d for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:04:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6EA3A7368 for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:04:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.3.2/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id o19G5jYT020062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:05:45 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (numailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.16]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:05:36 -0500
Received: from corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com [10.254.169.197]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id o19G5VZw030877; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:05:36 -0500
Received: from CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com ([10.254.89.201]) by corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:05:28 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:05:28 -0500
Message-ID: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB019D3F7E@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <02cd01caa5c0$43047570$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
Thread-Index: AcqlTJBgNRYrGuRqRr6UGAUc1Vns+wAc6MXAAPheTKA=
References: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB0188576D@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <02cd01caa5c0$43047570$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
From: <Black_David@emc.com>
To: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>, <storm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2010 16:05:28.0521 (UTC) FILETIME=[B2A11390:01CAA9A1]
X-EMM-EM: Active
Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:04:41 -0000

Yes, I've sent in the request.

Thanks,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Harrington
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Black, David; storm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> 
> Hi,
> 
> are you requesting webex support for the meeting?
> 
> David Harrington
> dbharrington@comcast.net
> ietfdbh@comcast.net
> dharrington@huawei.com
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org]
> > On Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:46 PM
> > To: storm@ietf.org
> > Subject: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> > Importance: High
> >
> > First, I apologize for the delay in getting this note out.  I
> > had every intent of getting storm WG activity going
> > immediately after the winter holidays, and then January
> > started with a bang at my day job and never let up.  For some
> > reason, the people who pay my salary expect me to do useful
> > work for them ...
> >
> > Announcement: The storm WG will meet during the IETF meeting
> > week, March 21-26 in Anaheim, CA.  I've asked for a 1.5 hour
> > meeting slot; we'll see what we get.  So, what are we going
> > to work on there?  Glad you asked ...
> >
> > The storm WG charter anticipates seven drafts:
> > 	- 5 protocol drafts: iSCSI consolidation, iSCSI update
> > (SAM features),
> > 		combined iFCP/FCIP update, RDDP MPA update, and
> > iSER update, plus
> > 	- 2 MIB updates, to the iFCP and iSCSI MIBs.
> > Five of these drafts have been submitted - your WG chairs
> > (Tom Talpey and I) are gently encouraging the authors of the
> > RDDP MPA update to submit the -00 version of that draft, and
> > we're holding off on the iSCSI MIB update draft until we have
> > a better idea of what will happen with the two iSCSI drafts
> > (the iSCSI MIB update depends not only on features added by
> > the iSCSI update draft, but also on features [if any] that
> > the WG decides to remove from the iSCSI consolidation draft).
> >
> > Here's the plan for the five drafts we have now:
> > - As his first official action as a WG chair, Tom (storm
> > co-chair) will start the WG last call on the iFCP/FCIP update
> > draft and the updated iFCP MIB shortly.  Tom will run this
> > last call because I'm the primary author/editor of that draft.
> > - The iSCSI-related drafts will be discussed in this
> > sequence: iSCSI update (SAM features), iSER, iSCSI
> > consolidation.  Please review and comment (to the list) on
> > the iSCSI update draft now:
> > 	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-00.txt
> > Discussion of the iSER draft will follow, and for the iSCSI
> > consolidation draft, please bring suggestions for what to
> > take out (because it's never been implemented) to the Anaheim
> > meeting, or post it to the list during the meeting week.
> >
> > That brings me to an important Reminder: Travel is NOT
> > REQUIRED to participate in the storm WG.  The intent is to
> > operate primarily via this mailing list, and anything that
> > happens in the Anaheim meeting will be posted to the list for
> > further comment and discussion before  any final decision or action.
> >
> > Thanks for your patience,
> > --David (storm WG co-chair)
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> > black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > storm mailing list
> > storm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> storm mailing list
> storm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm