Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity

[<[e-mail]>]

Yes, I've sent in the request.

Thanks,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of David Harrington
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Black, David; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> 
> Hi,
> 
> are you requesting webex support for the meeting?
> 
> David Harrington
> [e-mail]
> [e-mail]
> [e-mail]
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > On Behalf Of [e-mail]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:46 PM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> > Importance: High
> >
> > First, I apologize for the delay in getting this note out.  I
> > had every intent of getting storm WG activity going
> > immediately after the winter holidays, and then January
> > started with a bang at my day job and never let up.  For some
> > reason, the people who pay my salary expect me to do useful
> > work for them ...
> >
> > Announcement: The storm WG will meet during the IETF meeting
> > week, March 21-26 in Anaheim, CA.  I've asked for a 1.5 hour
> > meeting slot; we'll see what we get.  So, what are we going
> > to work on there?  Glad you asked ...
> >
> > The storm WG charter anticipates seven drafts:
> > 	- 5 protocol drafts: iSCSI consolidation, iSCSI update
> > (SAM features),
> > 		combined iFCP/FCIP update, RDDP MPA update, and
> > iSER update, plus
> > 	- 2 MIB updates, to the iFCP and iSCSI MIBs.
> > Five of these drafts have been submitted - your WG chairs
> > (Tom Talpey and I) are gently encouraging the authors of the
> > RDDP MPA update to submit the -00 version of that draft, and
> > we're holding off on the iSCSI MIB update draft until we have
> > a better idea of what will happen with the two iSCSI drafts
> > (the iSCSI MIB update depends not only on features added by
> > the iSCSI update draft, but also on features [if any] that
> > the WG decides to remove from the iSCSI consolidation draft).
> >
> > Here's the plan for the five drafts we have now:
> > - As his first official action as a WG chair, Tom (storm
> > co-chair) will start the WG last call on the iFCP/FCIP update
> > draft and the updated iFCP MIB shortly.  Tom will run this
> > last call because I'm the primary author/editor of that draft.
> > - The iSCSI-related drafts will be discussed in this
> > sequence: iSCSI update (SAM features), iSER, iSCSI
> > consolidation.  Please review and comment (to the list) on
> > the iSCSI update draft now:
> > 	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-00.txt
> > Discussion of the iSER draft will follow, and for the iSCSI
> > consolidation draft, please bring suggestions for what to
> > take out (because it's never been implemented) to the Anaheim
> > meeting, or post it to the list during the meeting week.
> >
> > That brings me to an important Reminder: Travel is NOT
> > REQUIRED to participate in the storm WG.  The intent is to
> > operate primarily via this mailing list, and anything that
> > happens in the Anaheim meeting will be posted to the list for
> > further comment and discussion before  any final decision or action.
> >
> > Thanks for your patience,
> > --David (storm WG co-chair)
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > [phone]             FAX: [phone]
> > [e-mail]        Mobile: [phone]
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > storm mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> storm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm