Archive

Pardon my dyslexia, if applicable, but what exactly is the change in 2.2?

All the best,

.Ralph

On 6/18/2013 7:02 PM, Black, David wrote:
> FYI - The following two typos are already fixed in my working version
> that will become the -02:
>
> Section 2.2, next to last line on page: "birthday" -> "birthday"
>
> Section 3.2, third paragraph, first line: "that that" -> "that"
>
> Thanks,
> --David
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Talpey
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:30 PM
>> To: storm@ietf.org
>> Subject: [storm] Working Group Last Call - IP Storage: IPsec Requirements
>> Update for IPsec v3
>> Importance: High
>>
>> This message is to announce the STORM working group Last Call on the following
>> document:
>>
>> IP Storage: IPsec Requirements Update for IPsec v3
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-01.txt
>>
>> This new document is created to align IP Storage IPsec profiles with IPsec-v3
>> requirements. The iSCSI consolidated draft and also the iSER draft will make
>> normative references to this new document, therefore it is desirable to move
>> it into the publication pipeline promptly, to unblock these other drafts.
>>
>> Last Call comments are due by Wednesday, July 3 at midnight Eastern time (two
>> weeks from today).
>>
>> Please send all technical comments to the storm mailing list: storm@ietf.org .
>> Editorial comments may be sent directly to the draft authors: draft-ietf-
>> storm-ipsec-ips-update@tools.ietf.org .
>>
>> Tom Talpey
>> STORM WG co-chair
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> storm mailing list
>> storm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> _______________________________________________
> storm mailing list
> storm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
>
>

Re: [storm] Working Group Last Call - IP Storage: IPsec Requirements Update for IPsec v3