Re: [storm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-storm-iser-12.txt> (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA Specification) to Proposed Standard

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Tue, 16 October 2012 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1B21F8862; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsO32EAr7XPK; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (hop-nat-141.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3AC21F8843; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si02.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI02.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.55]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q9GDZ7Cb006594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:35:07 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhubhoprd02.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.253]) by hop04-l1d11-si02.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:34:53 -0400
Received: from mxhub29.corp.emc.com (mxhub29.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.169]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q9GDYrPc027947; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:34:53 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.83]) by mxhub29.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.169]) with mapi; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:34:53 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:34:51 -0400
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-storm-iser-12.txt> (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA Specification) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: Ac2lX31I32J7Gj+hT5yYefxwCndKkwGQw7UQ
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE7120DFAEFE5@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
References: <20121008141321.3098.10116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121008141321.3098.10116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Cc: "storm@ietf.org" <storm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [storm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-storm-iser-12.txt> (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA Specification) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:35:10 -0000

For those interested in what has changed in this draft by comparison
to the specification of iSER in RFC 5046, here's a reasonably readable
diff that shows the text changes:

http://www.stiemerling.org/ietf/storm-review/diff-rfc5046-to-iser.html

and the edited version of RFC 5046 on which this was based

http://www.stiemerling.org/ietf/storm-review/rfc5046-edited.txt

All of the content of RFC 5046 is preserved in that version, but the
changes to improve the diff include swapping the order of sections 1
and 2 in order to match the storm-iser draft, and taking out page
gutters that confuse the IETF diff tool.

And many thanks to our AD (Martin Stiemerling) for hosting this on his
web site.

FYI,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of The IESG
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 10:13 AM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: storm@ietf.org
> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-storm-iser-12.txt> (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA
> Specification) to Proposed Standard
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the STORage Maintenance WG (storm)
> to consider the following document:
> - 'iSCSI Extensions for RDMA Specification'
>   <draft-ietf-storm-iser-12.txt> as Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-10-22. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    iSCSI Extensions for RDMA provides the RDMA data transfer capability
>    to iSCSI by layering iSCSI on top of an RDMA-Capable Protocol.  An
>    RDMA-Capable Protocol provides RDMA Read and Write services, which
>    enable data to be transferred directly into SCSI I/O Buffers without
>    intermediate data copies.  This document describes the extensions to
>    the iSCSI protocol to support RDMA services as provided by an RDMA-
>    Capable Protocol.
> 
>    This document obsoletes RFC 5046.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iser/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iser/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
>