[storm] Draft Anaheim storm meeting agenda

<Black_David@emc.com> Thu, 11 March 2010 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Black_David@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAF73A6850 for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qAm4B5M0ioe6 for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2543A67E1 for <storm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com []) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.3.2/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id o2B6SvUx018611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:28:57 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (nagas.lss.emc.com []) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:28:51 -0500
Received: from corpussmtp5.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp5.corp.emc.com []) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id o2B6Sp7h015197 for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:28:51 -0500
Received: from CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com ([]) by corpussmtp5.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:28:50 -0500
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:23:52 -0500
Message-ID: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB01E6F724@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
Thread-Topic: Draft Anaheim storm meeting agenda
Thread-Index: AcrA42sxUmOnOLz9Tu2xuqKMYRYWxw==
From: <Black_David@emc.com>
To: <storm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2010 06:28:50.0957 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D4443D0:01CAC0E4]
X-EMM-EM: Active
Subject: [storm] Draft Anaheim storm meeting agenda
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:28:55 -0000

I put this together quickly to get something available today.
Comments, revisions, suggestions for changes, etc. are welcome.

WebEx should be available.

The intent is to continue to operate the WG primarily via the mailing


IETF storm (STORage Maintenance) WG
DRAFT meeting agenda
Thursday, March 25, 2010, 0900-1130
Anaheim, CA, USA

Note: Meeting is unlikely to use entire time slot.

Administrivia, agenda bashing, draft status review, etc. - 15 min
		David L. Black, EMC (co-chair)
	Blue sheets
	Note Well

iFCP-related drafts (draft-ietf-storm-ifcp-ipn133-updates-01,
			draft-ietf-storm-ifcpmib-01) - 5 min
		David L. Black, EMC (co-chair, ifcp-ipn133 author)
	Status report: WG Last Call is complete	

iSCSI Update (draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-00) - 20 min
		Fred Knight, NetApp
	Negotiation key
	SAM-5 SCSI version designator
	Any other topics

	NOTE: This draft may be going into WG Last Call much earlier
than Sep 2010 date in WG charter

RDMA-related Drafts (draft-ietf-storm-iser-00,
draft-ietf-storm-mpa-peer-connect-01) - 10 min
		Tom Talpey, Microsoft & David L. Black, EMC (co-chairs)
		Draft authors (Mike Ko, IBM & Arkady Kanevsky, EMC)
	Summarize known topics & issues that need attention.

Main iSCSI draft (draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-00)

	Please bring suggestions for unimplemented/unused iSCSI features
to take out of this draft.