Re: [storm] iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups

"Mark Bakke (mbakke)" <mbakke@cisco.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mbakke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0079521F86A5 for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-df7B+Ka3eD for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEC421F8678 for <storm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mbakke@cisco.com; l=1728; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312389273; x=1313598873; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=1ByABibOcodrHc5xtTg2D2zNQfP0j9Vcj6NxXPVoxx0=; b=JgGJX8tJooYXAUNMtwGBiNPA/AAP9Qlsy2t5PnUSRLtCe87Fcm0NLwRw JhaSSqlW4iPyax7iSclKcWxiEsTh/5IvJwN6LTPUGhgz+UCMqKgRxrz2X 5XdvmPL+vxEXbTgZvmfhwqRXwZunSR9P+FyVZRD6B3X2LVih06aGLKZP6 E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AukAAHx3OU6tJV2b/2dsb2JhbAA/A5gGj1p3gUABAQEBAwEBAQ8BHT4XBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgEmHwkIAQEEARIIGodOohEBnmSDPoIlXwSHKy+QMYty
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,311,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="9306177"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2011 16:34:33 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com [72.163.62.200]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p73GYXch015997; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:34:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-105.cisco.com ([72.163.62.147]) by xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:34:32 -0500
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:34:30 -0500
Message-ID: <97CC2D4896BE5D48825529CE9A168825064DCC99@XMB-RCD-105.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E05895140FA@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [storm] iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups
Thread-Index: AcxRaMYdlyjjNJprTU2x1caA8uT1wQAkg9dQ
References: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E05895140FA@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
From: "Mark Bakke (mbakke)" <mbakke@cisco.com>
To: <david.black@emc.com>, <storm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Aug 2011 16:34:32.0570 (UTC) FILETIME=[393AD5A0:01CC51FB]
Subject: Re: [storm] iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:34:22 -0000

Thanks, David!

BTW, for the attributes we added -- InstXNodeArchitecture, IntrLoginAuthorizeFails, SsnProtocolLevel, and SsnTaskReporting, we simply added these to the appropriate AttributesEntry objects, and to their conformance statements.  We believe that's correct for adding new attributes.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of david.black@emc.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:06 PM
To: storm@ietf.org
Subject: [storm] iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups

Our AD (Dave Harrington) raised a concern in the Quebec City meeting about whether the updates to the compliance statement and conformance groups were done correctly in the -00 iSCSI MIB update draft (i.e., by deprecating the existing objects that should no longer be used, and defining new objects to replace them).

I'm pleased to report that our talented MIB author team (Mark and Prakash) got this right - there is a deprecated compliance statement plus multiple deprecated conformance groups in the -00 draft, accompanied by a V2 compliance statement and new V2 conformance groups corresponding to the deprecated groups.  Well done!

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
storm mailing list
storm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm