[storm] iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups

<david.black@emc.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC0621F84FB for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 16:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.682
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.917, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjJBdYyzi4tr for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 16:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE0F21F84FA for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 16:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si02.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI02.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.55]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p72N6Vt4018834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:06:31 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.222.226]) by hop04-l1d11-si02.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:06:14 -0400
Received: from mxhub29.corp.emc.com (mxhub29.corp.emc.com [128.221.47.158]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p72N6EaX029624 for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:06:14 -0400
Received: from mx14a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.245]) by mxhub29.corp.emc.com ([128.221.47.158]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:06:13 -0400
From: <david.black@emc.com>
To: <storm@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:06:12 -0400
Thread-Topic: iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups
Thread-Index: AcxRaMYdlyjjNJprTU2x1caA8uT1wQ==
Message-ID: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E05895140FA@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: [storm] iSCSI MIB Compliance Groups
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:23 -0000

Our AD (Dave Harrington) raised a concern in the Quebec City meeting about whether the updates to the compliance statement and conformance groups were done correctly in the -00 iSCSI MIB update draft (i.e., by deprecating the existing objects that should no longer be used, and defining new objects to replace them).

I'm pleased to report that our talented MIB author team (Mark and Prakash) got this right - there is a deprecated compliance statement plus multiple deprecated conformance groups in the -00 draft, accompanied by a V2 compliance statement and new V2 conformance groups corresponding to the deprecated groups.  Well done!

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------