[storm] Anaheim meeting - WebEx

<Black_David@emc.com> Wed, 03 March 2010 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Black_David@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD413A89F9 for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:06:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9sxqJpth4i+e for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E7A3A68ED for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.3.2/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id o2316o2q006632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:06:51 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (numailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.16]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:06:39 -0500
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.169.196]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id o2316dgK020976 for <storm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:06:39 -0500
Received: from CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com ([10.254.89.202]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:06:39 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:06:38 -0500
Message-ID: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB01D1DF76@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB019D3F7E@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Anaheim meeting - WebEx
Thread-Index: AcqlTJBgNRYrGuRqRr6UGAUc1Vns+wAc6MXAAPheTKAEMvDmcA==
References: <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB0188576D@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com><02cd01caa5c0$43047570$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB019D3F7E@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com>
From: <Black_David@emc.com>
To: <storm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2010 01:06:39.0218 (UTC) FILETIME=[C758FD20:01CABA6D]
X-EMM-EM: Active
Subject: [storm] Anaheim meeting - WebEx
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:06:52 -0000

There will be WebEx for the storm meeting in Anaheim.  The meeting is Thursday, March 25 @ 9am.

Thanks,
--David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:05 AM
> To: ietfdbh@comcast.net; storm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> 
> Yes, I've sent in the request.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Harrington
> > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:34 PM
> > To: Black, David; storm@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > are you requesting webex support for the meeting?
> >
> > David Harrington
> > dbharrington@comcast.net
> > ietfdbh@comcast.net
> > dharrington@huawei.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org]
> > > On Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:46 PM
> > > To: storm@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [storm] Anaheim meeting & WG activity
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > > First, I apologize for the delay in getting this note out.  I
> > > had every intent of getting storm WG activity going
> > > immediately after the winter holidays, and then January
> > > started with a bang at my day job and never let up.  For some
> > > reason, the people who pay my salary expect me to do useful
> > > work for them ...
> > >
> > > Announcement: The storm WG will meet during the IETF meeting
> > > week, March 21-26 in Anaheim, CA.  I've asked for a 1.5 hour
> > > meeting slot; we'll see what we get.  So, what are we going
> > > to work on there?  Glad you asked ...
> > >
> > > The storm WG charter anticipates seven drafts:
> > > 	- 5 protocol drafts: iSCSI consolidation, iSCSI update
> > > (SAM features),
> > > 		combined iFCP/FCIP update, RDDP MPA update, and
> > > iSER update, plus
> > > 	- 2 MIB updates, to the iFCP and iSCSI MIBs.
> > > Five of these drafts have been submitted - your WG chairs
> > > (Tom Talpey and I) are gently encouraging the authors of the
> > > RDDP MPA update to submit the -00 version of that draft, and
> > > we're holding off on the iSCSI MIB update draft until we have
> > > a better idea of what will happen with the two iSCSI drafts
> > > (the iSCSI MIB update depends not only on features added by
> > > the iSCSI update draft, but also on features [if any] that
> > > the WG decides to remove from the iSCSI consolidation draft).
> > >
> > > Here's the plan for the five drafts we have now:
> > > - As his first official action as a WG chair, Tom (storm
> > > co-chair) will start the WG last call on the iFCP/FCIP update
> > > draft and the updated iFCP MIB shortly.  Tom will run this
> > > last call because I'm the primary author/editor of that draft.
> > > - The iSCSI-related drafts will be discussed in this
> > > sequence: iSCSI update (SAM features), iSER, iSCSI
> > > consolidation.  Please review and comment (to the list) on
> > > the iSCSI update draft now:
> > > 	http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-00.txt
> > > Discussion of the iSER draft will follow, and for the iSCSI
> > > consolidation draft, please bring suggestions for what to
> > > take out (because it's never been implemented) to the Anaheim
> > > meeting, or post it to the list during the meeting week.
> > >
> > > That brings me to an important Reminder: Travel is NOT
> > > REQUIRED to participate in the storm WG.  The intent is to
> > > operate primarily via this mailing list, and anything that
> > > happens in the Anaheim meeting will be posted to the list for
> > > further comment and discussion before  any final decision or action.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patience,
> > > --David (storm WG co-chair)
> > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> > > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > > +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> > > black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > storm mailing list
> > > storm@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > storm mailing list
> > storm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> storm mailing list
> storm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm