[storm] iSER update request from Alex Nezhinsky on AHS size

Mike Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com> Thu, 20 August 2009 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Original-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496943A6D0D for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.072
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.072 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.526, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fB5a-fmjHwgp for <storm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta1.huaweisymantec.com (mta1.huaweisymantec.com [218.17.155.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691DB3A6A0E for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Ju7YYU986otoZNI97DKNKQ)"
Received: from hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com ([172.26.3.41]) by hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KOP008H07R8OS80@hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com> for storm@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:25:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from LENOVO6EA8F9DF ([68.65.79.146]) by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KOP00CJQ7R6DI00@hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for storm@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:25:56 +0800 (CST)
Message-id: <3156565070524C6D837F14783BA2FB60@china.huawei.com>
From: Mike Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com>
To: STORM <storm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:26:23 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: [storm] iSER update request from Alex Nezhinsky on AHS size
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:26:16 -0000

Alex sent me the following iSER update request:

> In the Infiniband implementation ISER has to post recv-buffers for
> the maximal possible message length. If a PDU contains AHS, then no
> upper size limit can be set beforehand, because AHS size is not fixed
> (it is determined by the contents of BHS, TotalAHSLength field). Then
> our posted buffer may prove insufficient.
>
> Suggested solution: to add a hard limit on AHS length as an
> operational parameter, per session. This is in a sense similar to
> MaxOutstandingUnexpectedPDUs key which has no
> meaning in a stream-based protocol.

It sounds reasonable to me.  If there is no objection, we can add the MaxAHSLength key to the iSER update as Alex suggested.

Mike