Re: [storm] iSCSI drafts - Last Call update and extension

Mallikarjun Chadalapaka <cbm@chadalapaka.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cbm@chadalapaka.com>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541541F0C3C for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.219, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4n7TNeQaIo4c for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snt0-omc3-s49.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc3-s49.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FD31F0C3E for <storm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SNT131-DS7 ([65.55.90.135]) by snt0-omc3-s49.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:42:32 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [131.107.0.86]
X-Originating-Email: [cbm@chadalapaka.com]
Message-ID: <SNT131-ds7FFD0ED2F1937D478B5A1A02B0@phx.gbl>
From: Mallikarjun Chadalapaka <cbm@chadalapaka.com>
To: <david.black@emc.com>, <storm@ietf.org>
References: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058960A0E7@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058960A0E7@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:42:10 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGxuxIQHKHR6VALYrelcKhnd3+5ypVYVraQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2011 20:42:32.0635 (UTC) FILETIME=[5AA2D0B0:01CC5DE7]
Subject: Re: [storm] iSCSI drafts - Last Call update and extension
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:41:38 -0000

As David says below, Last call implementer review feedback is very welcome.

I personally am reaching out to implementers in Microsoft, and so far
haven't uncovered any major issues (barring a clarification that I sent two
days ago to the mailing list).

I have now posted the iSCSI Last Call review slides that I used in internal
reviews.  This covers both iSCSI drafts in Last Call.  Given the size of the
consolidated draft, you may take advantage of the slides in speeding up your
reviews.  Please drop me a note if you'd like to see something
added/updated.

http://www.chadalapaka.com/Documents/iSCSI%20Drafts%20–%20Last%20Call%20Revi
ew.pdf 

Thanks.

Mallikarjun


  -----Original Message-----
  From: storm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:storm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
  Of david.black@emc.com
  Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:00 PM
  To: storm@ietf.org
  Subject: [storm] iSCSI drafts - Last Call update and extension
  Importance: High
  
  Reminder: the two iSCSI drafts are in WG Last Call:
  
  			iSCSI Protocol (Consolidated)
  	  	    draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-03.txt
  
         Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) SAM
                   draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-03.txt
  
  Please send all technical comments to the storm mailing list
  (storm@ietf.org).
  Editorial comments may be sent directly to the draft editors:
  - iSCSI Protocol (Consolidated): Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
  <cbm@chadalapaka.com>
  - iSCSI SAM (new features): Frederick Knight <knight@netapp.com>
  
  A new version of the SAM draft is expected sometime soon to correct
  problems in the title, abstract, and IANA registry text (the IANA changes
  were discussed in Quebec City - they mostly affect the range of
allocatable
  values, not the actual values used in these two drafts).
  
  I've been reaching out to a number of implementation groups at EMC,
  VMware and Dell, along with the Linux implementers.  I have some feedback
  - one of the EMC implementation groups looked at the SAM draft and the
  changes that the consolidated iSCSI draft makes to the existing RFCs and
  indicated that they saw no problems with the changes.
  
  August seems to be a slow month for everyone.  Therefore the WG Last Call
  on these two drafts is EXTENDED to midnight, US Eastern Time on Tuesday,
  September 6.
  
  Thanks,
  --David (storm WG co-chair)
  ----------------------------------------------------
  David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
  EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
  +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
  david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
  ----------------------------------------------------
  
  
  _______________________________________________
  storm mailing list
  storm@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm