[storm] Vancouver minutes posted

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Sat, 09 November 2013 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C021E8132 for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:37:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.326, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4knbJvZWmVL for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:37:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5B721E8087 for <storm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.160]) by mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id rA91aRIb015692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <storm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:36:27 -0500
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com rA91aRIb015692
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1383960988; bh=+1dfbT7hheFZ3VmCKQSpCzBsiYA=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=UCTwCic62673jMLlSKtVRd2WF84BB98Wm7JlVIsNhC824bWLv05is8cTKDw/ebFVb uKRna8IkbiTfoE53QJ5sKWXmvyyfG+gEwgZOf1efteR2VuRNp7UNvRmT2mKJkEICjr LdXYm5AW/xDHQTe/hPuP82XLHj13GHq4oQI7NbCY=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com rA91aRIb015692
Received: from mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.25]) by maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <storm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:36:11 -0500
Received: from mxhub08.corp.emc.com (mxhub08.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.205]) by mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id rA91aAdV007173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <storm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:36:11 -0500
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.239]) by mxhub08.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.205]) with mapi; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:34:52 -0500
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "storm@ietf.org" <storm@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:36:08 -0500
Thread-Topic: Vancouver minutes posted
Thread-Index: Ac7c7A4eUG5pS8pyQOq0dPmF7w3m5w==
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712026AAEC477@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Subject: [storm] Vancouver minutes posted
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:37:24 -0000

The Vancouver storm WG session was a productive RDMA/IP Mini-BOF - I'd
like to thank the presenters and participants.

The minutes are now posted at:
	http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/minutes/minutes-88-storm

Please send any corrections to me (and the list if you think they're
important).

Here are the three conclusions from the Mini-BOF:

(1) There are opportunities for IBTA/IETF collaboration on topics related
to Routable RoCE as the IBTA continues their activity to specify it.  The
storm WG chairs (David Black, Tom Talpey) will continue to explore
collaboration possibilities with Diego Crupnicoff (IBTA) and report
back as appropriate.

(2) There was a lot of interest in the room in congestion control.  IETF
congestion control work is best done in other WGs in a general fashion,
as opposed to designing a congestion control mechanism specific to RDMA.
OTOH, RDMA is a fine source of requirements for congestion control.
People interested in congestion control should follow up directly with
other IETF WGs that are doing congestion control work, e.g., aqm, rmcat.

(3) It makes sense to continue to enhance iWARP to obtain functional
parity with InfiniBand - this provides RDMA transport choice at upper
layers (commonality at RDMA verbs interface and above).  An Internet-Draft
that specifies the remaining necessary enhancements to iWARP is expected
soon, and will be directed to the storm WG.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------