[storm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6580 (3181)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 09 April 2012 18:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: storm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06CF21F87E6 for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjbZhK1mhixc for <storm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF8A21F87E0 for <storm@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7B43E62179; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: mkosjc@gmail.com, david.black@emc.com, wes@mti-systems.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, ttalpey@microsoft.com, black_david@emc.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120409181416.7B43E62179@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:14:16 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, storm@ietf.org
Subject: [storm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6580 (3181)
X-BeenThere: storm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Storage Maintenance WG <storm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/storm>
List-Post: <mailto:storm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm>, <mailto:storm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:14:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6580, "IANA Registries for the Remote Direct Data Placement (RDDP) Protocols". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6580&eid=3181 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: David L. Black <david.black@emc.com> Section: 3.5 Original Text ------------- Name of the registry: "SCTP Function Codes for DDP Session Control" Namespace details: SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) function codes for DDP session control are 16-bit values [RFC5043]. Corrected Text -------------- Name of the registry: "SCTP Function Codes for DDP Stream Session Control" Namespace details: SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) function codes for DDP stream session control are 16-bit values [RFC5043]. Notes ----- IANA found this minor naming discrepancy with RFC 5043 in performing registry updates. The word "stream" needs to be inserted in two places. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6580 (draft-ietf-storm-rddp-registries-02) -------------------------------------- Title : IANA Registries for the Remote Direct Data Placement (RDDP) Protocols Publication Date : April 2012 Author(s) : M. Ko, D. Black Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : STORage Maintenance Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [storm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6580 (3181) RFC Errata System