Re: [Stox] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-im-12: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 04 March 2015 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01CE1A005A for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:22:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G4XZLzt0aFe5 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E54F1A0033 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecar1 with SMTP id ar1so71782552iec.11 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:21:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L2aw2BGLUjFi6f7qLRXvTdEJSdZUcvp69VK5hQdaiP4=; b=HjRu2QBUqn4cUlk+52dbgpeHy90ozS7pn6XewM5av7A0B5UlhGAAsNTFIdduunszcH 64I0VVH1/r7qh/5c4CXi2uhI/PgXeCrSeaHjAtOqkoxDmLVnQXLBtqEgFyPFbYUoWhA+ xBbaeoJNl9M3k5qNmsrj5kqYHAc4VmzrAjNhLwm9rz5SwQ0C3l0F11DLgNTOwvGw+q+9 169kf8T0PQkGexDV9PfpCjaautyJQ+o/zqkwr1yyUdzVNYKf1RKsEZ3U4n5cLesZWjhL wrXqAO2PA4kmLV3GDMks5PqJkXRiGjgbAa52pmpsJFb8xliUuv7OPls7KGA1aYcJzojJ HIhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLsteRANjtdHaKZ2WjnBhgqp+ynF+iQWG0vYPXKpNb8gyyVTLpt1qiYRtu3/0nsq4O36+w
X-Received: by 10.50.143.106 with SMTP id sd10mr15968186igb.17.1425511318864; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:21:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d1sm11628232igl.9.2015.03.04.15.21.57 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:21:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F79395.4010304@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:21:57 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150303130801.14912.66751.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150303130801.14912.66751.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/0_ewF3_m2LMOHqT2V3hpy506ou8>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, yana@jitsi.org, draft-ietf-stox-im.all@ietf.org, stox-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-im-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:22:00 -0000

On 3/3/15 6:08 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-stox-im-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stox-im/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> - I'm surprised it's so easy to be honest;-)

?

> - The reference to rfc 3923 isn't that useful is it?

No, it's not.

> I mean
> because nobody really does that afaik.

I am not aware of any implementations.

> If someone does do it
> (I could imagine an enterprise scale thing working), then
> maybe better to say that while it'd work, it's really
> uncommon, or some such.

It's much more likely that someone could use OTR:

https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/