Re: [Stox] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 04 March 2015 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9441A00F5 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:52:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssqh1TeMl6yW for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECBB1A00F1 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so4108535iec.7 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:52:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nojsopvEg+1IfVmfU4tVnFUYAwpiVOKdYYlBkYrxR1I=; b=mynOXt24LORkmcgmaW1cAVWZLCjEBrks2iWEGgcPQg0kTkGRjQhW+GaMeoaeqm5P7O nmmvXS83ItGT8cc824ub3W33qgAMzOFMFuMzDNLiLRxiqwSK9ugdA9ZEbi2bhJ7tXLwr 0m8OYWpGglCwKfYJQ+emeN24mzxFKj20+Rou7DKmU1lv7M/1AaZII1PWLMB/GSY5yw7K cIsbpC+gzs1cqo7ECxAFPTFigFpo9f1EqJJ9eAN5u3pZTGtVHRizTX17fapxod75WDYt gx/wrBg/F9wKNZaaJR++dZs9ABsfswTpl9uFQbusxSuGY5rf4p8PaZqsTlpus4euHdbQ niyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXDkH/CxFVSNaMxPtFxDYEgKKlmFz1kFvG/pmqIJkeoZczUrHmbC+Ef+F10H7OWtPlZGDZ
X-Received: by 10.50.122.68 with SMTP id lq4mr42397556igb.10.1425513140252; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a196sm3821324ioe.41.2015.03.04.15.52.18 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F79AB2.8090700@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:52:18 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150303204228.1780.23346.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150303204228.1780.23346.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/1Gyqaj280mf8nvuFbsyXeOFyMNU>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, yana@jitsi.org, stox-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:52:23 -0000

On 3/3/15 1:42 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stox-chat/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> - OTR works for xmpp. I think (not sure) it could be made
> work for MSRP or SIMPLE, and presumably then it might work
> here. If that's true, be good to note that and explain a bit
> how to do that. (And I don't mean the long-promised OTR I-D,
> just a pointer at the inevitably bad best reference we can
> find.)

Yes, we might do that in all three of these specs (or, as Barry 
suggests, mention it in the -im spec and point there from the others).

> - End of p12: "are suggested" is odd to see in an RFC, it
> might be better if you find some other wording.

I tend to agree with Barry that this is a UX thing, not a true interop 
thing.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/