[Stox] Pete Resnick's comments on draft-ietf-stox-groupchat

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 18:28 UTC

Message-ID: <54F8A038.9040800@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:28:08 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "stox@ietf.org" <stox@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/4FikIvsdGzsP3hi0XyOV4VVga9s>
Subject: [Stox] Pete Resnick's comments on draft-ietf-stox-groupchat
Precedence: list

Still catching up on missed feedback...

Pete Resnick wrote:

    4: There's a noun missing here:

       By contrast, in
       MSRP sessions (including groupchat sessions) are considered to
       be a type of media (similar to audio/video sessions)

Actually that should be "in MSRP," or "sessions (including groupchat 
sessions) in MSRP"...

    The bullet list refers to "muc.example.com", but Figure 1 shows
    "rooms.example.com".

Noted.

    The particular endpoints for both romeo and juliet are not shown in
    the figure, but the bullet list doesn't say, "not shown in diagram".

I think it's best to specify that each of those things at the bottom of 
the diagram are indeed the endpoints. You can't communicate from a mere 
account, only from a connected endpoint.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

[Stox] Pete Resnick's comments on draft-ietf-stox… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet