Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt

Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> Fri, 09 September 2016 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <saul@ag-projects.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD1C12B3A9 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 02:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78GCyu0hxwip for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 02:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node16.dns-hosting.info [81.23.228.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511D012B3C5 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 02:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.35] (unknown [90.209.144.173]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E68C914AC036; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:55:48 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F38826C8-7F5D-4A07-BE09-D7788F66CB95"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C304BC3-0AD3-48C4-958B-AC44122892D7@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:55:46 +0100
Message-Id: <5FA29740-BCD2-402D-BEB1-417A66CA7603@ag-projects.com>
References: <147241625250.24476.13333521107304467910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a139f13c-9745-0d86-853b-d5d6b8c9124c@stpeter.im> <E1C65C7E-CDFF-40BC-AF01-B2F029B64E6E@nostrum.com> <931fcd90-11c8-0b58-b3ad-eb6e7be2557e@stpeter.im> <f12534a1-bdce-925f-3358-c22975dd3bbe@stpeter.im> <512b8d52-68e1-2bdd-d153-20e24fbb73de@stpeter.im> <B197ACCC-5DB0-4C8F-8C54-1159A89B1796@nostrum.com> <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im> <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com> <76151e8b-9abf-7587-c36d-e2bf38180245@stpeter.im> <0C304BC3-0AD3-48C4-958B-AC44122892D7@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/7lcHK7F_KKKLj_6GzGZs6oOuj9A>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 09:57:23 -0000

> On 07 Sep 2016, at 22:00, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> (+ shepherd)
> 
> On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:50, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> If so, I think we can take that
>>> version to IETF last call.
>> 
>> Great! The document shepherd might need to update his writeup.
> 
> On a quick scan, I think the shepherd writeup is okay, but we should let Saul verify that (and also confirm that he agrees this is ready to go to last call.)
> 
> Saul, do you agree on on both (or either)?
> 

Hi,

I just came across this, sorry! I’ll take a look on Monday since I’ll be ask the new couple of days, sorry about that!


Cheers!

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects