Re: [Stox] Review on -im

One more thing: IMHO we should also mention that "headline" XMPP messages should be translated like the normal ones in this spec. Not in -chat though.

On Jul 30, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here is my review on the -im document:
> 
> - Section 3 suggests that the thread element in XMPP should be mapped to the Call-ID header. I see why this was done, but it looks a bit like abusing it. I would probably take it out or define it as a CPIM header, in case CPIM is used. Thoughts?
> 
> - Section 5 only mentions text/plain and text/html, I think we should add message/cpim in there.
> 
> - Similarly to chat, I think we should define a mapping between XMPP chatstates (XEP-0085) and the iscomosing indication (RFC 3994), but in this case there would be no mapping for the 'gone' state.
> 
> 
> * Editorial nits:
> 
> - In the examples: From, To and Contact header URIs are not enclosed in angle brackets
> - In the example in section 4, the RURI should have the gr parameter as well,as the To header is not used for routing
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> AG Projects
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stox mailing list
> stox@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects