Re: [Stox] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-stox-im-10

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 05 February 2015 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9611A8876 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:57:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ge_Quzf14EVm for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E77C71A8873 for <stox@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:57:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFDD209FC for <stox@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:57:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:57:18 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= x-sasl-enc:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= mesmtp; bh=BtcyvOakBPxpa4GnBXNBgvDayio=; b=h4tYxp4sD3OFxZIFa/X35 38IBsUcHV0zTWzLkyiuy3thgJHYmv54y/yQd1ab3nP6EwD/eRgXpzf6dMQGfhB43 6iNCrK1WyWOMF7FXGg/SzGrhN3+/0GdoM8drb5EiPMp2I4PvOicO2XnuwNVTxwQs wJFvWRUE6x18NMQ0nW0+f8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=BtcyvOakBPxpa4GnBXNBgvD ayio=; b=syRkDI6a9fB9TnLn7LNBOkzv/KMT8VoTGCOwKoWoHf1klGxJCdaw6TS SBEfkHkFlOv2gTZtd8/zhEEZ9XvOMgKG3jKE6zFJtb3m6awov8LzmJcrRAE0O4wl GqUGEBOzaVNbJv4mFUqn23/9EtOS2mI0KyfnFIRRrW1wA30gM6oo=
X-Sasl-enc: HEykagWYqqwVGc51U43oYk8Iu+d2a5Qh6lvOlK0vu6v2 1423180637
Received: from [10.128.182.85] (unknown [70.35.43.175]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09504C0029B; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:57:16 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <54D3D7B5.6010206@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:57:13 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5CCCEED5-DF78-49A6-AA0A-EB18ACAEB551@cooperw.in>
References: <48B4925F-747B-4453-AF7F-3B1E9505A549@cooperw.in> <54D3D7B5.6010206@andyet.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/A932sc2nVZ38dkTbL2EjKiLa1ac>
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-stox-im-10
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 23:57:23 -0000

Thanks. It will likely take me a few days to go through the responses.

On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> wrote:

> On 1/31/15 5:09 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> I have reviewed this draft in preparation for IETF LC, along with the
>> -chat and -groupchat drafts. Overall the document appears in good
>> shape. I have a comment I’d like to discuss before proceeding to IETF
>> LC, along with an editorial nit to be addressed with any LC
>> comments.
> 
> Hi Alissa, we've updated all three drafts to address your comments. Let us know if there's anything else you need from the authors in order to proceed.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://andyet.com/