[Stox] Martin Stiemerling comment's on draft-ietf-stox-groupchat

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958561A1EFD for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:58:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OdtzGnu0Xt60 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D2151A1EF5 for <stox@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ierx19 with SMTP id x19so78747799ier.3 for <stox@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:58:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Np2pemyS1GN9N6z5St7cHdZoEH808tAdutf+X6v8L4A=; b=GzHj1ggwKkOpxuOpei+wQYuCUTc0gwJb/larh4cCSf8YKABiZDpzO+NzTaQxs2F0WE odfZ8eudDeeWWgdpkdtf03OwRWeqk18rzn+vzpB8s+goDr8doukGvJZ9KEZdWFjF8TXI MAusijnyHeKgy0p0luvsJ0JMDfKpRdazNcGq64K3Rrrg9X6pLwUZJn4PvxRWoFRbhEV0 ZFazRQrMn3OgUi14UiySaKx3D+Ne8QRtil3tETIAB04cCHR0W2rJn8TxW8I1m+qaaJe/ h50B+RQoT3tE45DuSSWWh475XCcnWFt/S07ukoQAdPc0WeqkgoCCuFZIpt0VSBxGqZbu Kykg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXaKR0vy8Uy/RoaqBEbuiPvI5t+idQnbjgJTD9uRpozGbyBg/xaiJyjqT7Fs8k5wzsMPcA
X-Received: by with SMTP id n9mr5228941icf.20.1425578317661; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. []) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qr1sm13230724igb.18.2015. (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F8994C.7050702@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:58:36 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "stox@ietf.org" <stox@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/CUQXyLZY-6c6yiNvVw6GBL3TR8U>
Subject: [Stox] Martin Stiemerling comment's on draft-ietf-stox-groupchat
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:58:39 -0000

Again, my apologies for missing the comments in the IESG evaluation record.

Martin Stiemerling wrote:

    Two question about this text out of the ACK section:
    "Some text in this document was borrowed from [RFC7247] and from

    This draft has the standard IETF copyright template upfront and
    'borrows' text from [XEP-0045]. I assume borrows actually mean
    copying text, isn't it?

    Do the authors and the responsible AD see any conflicts between the
    copyright of [XEP-0045] and the copyright of this document?

    Are the borrowed text parts out of [XEP-0045] marked somehow? I
    could find the parts.

I just scanned draft-ietf-stox-groupchat and I could not find any text 
copied from XEP-0045. We might have had such text in an earlier version, 
but I don't see any now. Thus I think it would be best to remove that 
acknowledgement (after verifying that there is indeed no copied text).


Peter Saint-Andre