Re: [Stox] review: stox-im-03

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Sal, thanks for the review.

On 9/20/13 4:42 AM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:

> my only comments is about the fact that section 3. XMPP to SIP 
> implies that the MESSAGE is always (and maybe can only be)
> delivered over a TCP connection; RFC3428 states
> 
> Whenever possible, MESSAGE requests SHOULD be sent over transports 
> that implement end-to-end congestion control, such as TCP or SCTP. 
> However, SIP does not provide a mechanism to prevent a downstream
> hop from sending a request over UDP.
> 
> so you can delivery it over UDP as well and that has also being
> raised in a previous thread while talking on the Call-ID mapping to
> <thread/>. Actually you will be forced to deliver over UDP if the
> SIMPLE server only supports UDP.

It's not clear to me why the XMPP-to-SIP gateway couldn't communicate
with the SIMPLE server over UDP. Which text in Section 3 do you think
implies that only TCP connections are supported?

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=5aYJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----