IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] Reminder core and presence review deadline

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sat, 17 August 2013 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAD911E81AA for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHWqjPAg2V5V for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861021F8F97 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76F2A414F7; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:28:39 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <520EED2A.1000702@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:25:30 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com
References: <4D3962E0-8825-4CB3-B7EB-B4FE840AC15E@jitsi.org> <520BC689.4040505@stpeter.im> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A0760A2@008-AM1MPN1-042.mgdnok.nokia.com> <520BDF34.5040503@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <520BDF34.5040503@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org, yana@jitsi.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Reminder core and presence review deadline
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 03:25:37 -0000

On 8/14/13 1:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 8/14/13 1:32 PM, Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reminder.
>>>
>>> How would the chairs like to proceed on updated versions? In my
>>> working copies I have incorporated the results of list discussion,
>>> so I can submit revised I-Ds for core and presence after August 16
>>> or really at any time.
>>
>> Would you be able to submit a diff or summary of changes that you
>> have already planned for -core and -presence to the list so that
>> reviewers who haven't yet started can take those into account?
> 
> I use the IETF SVN repository for this work so people can track the
> changes there:
> 
> https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/stox/
> 
> All the modifications have been discussed on the list.
> 
>> Perhaps we should wait until next week before publishing -02 not to
>> confuse anyone about which version to review right now.
> 
> Sure. I don't think any of the changes are really big, but publishing
> -02 early next week would give people a chance to see the very latest text.

An update now that August 16 has come and gone: I think presence-02 is
ready to be submitted, but there's an open issue with the core spec
(response code mappings) so I'll wait for conclusions from list
discussion to emerge before submitting core-02.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email