Re: [Stox] current status

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 06 September 2013 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7154811E81A5 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.439, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gawd384BqHNE for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE2121F9D21 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [128.107.239.234]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C6D4414D0; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:40:09 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <522A046A.3050105@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:35:54 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
References: <52294513.8080407@stpeter.im> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A099FB8@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <8EFEDB10-B1D2-4D58-80A1-BDC24BF1EA8E@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <8EFEDB10-B1D2-4D58-80A1-BDC24BF1EA8E@ag-projects.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org, "<Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>" <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Stox] current status
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:36:01 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/6/13 10:16 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> 
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 3:25 PM, <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com> 
> <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> There have been a fair number of comments on -core, -im and 
>> -presence since the Berlin IETF. Please take a look at the new 
>> versions http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stox-core-04.txt 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stox-im-02.txt 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stox-presence-04.txt and see
>> if your issues have been properly addressed, and/or whether you
>> want to still raise any new issues.
>> 
>> If nothing specific comes up, the chairs will consider starting
>> WG LC on these documents in the near future.
>> 
>> One thing that I wonder about -core is whether it is a good idea
>> to stabilize or last call it yet at this point, since there have
>> been some issues raised about -media that might have impact to
>> -core, such as dealing with SIP side forking or loop detection.
>> So is it better to wait with -core until -media is more stable?
>> 
> 
> At some point we agreed that those issues would be handled in
> -media, because in other cases (chat, presence, im) the gateway is
> itself the endpoint and handles all the "media", so those didn't
> seem to apply.

That is my recollection, too.

Thus I'd be in favor of stabilizing the -core spec, and hanlding the
forking issues in the -media spec.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=6RTC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----