IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 07 September 2016 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDD012B118 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.41
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahr85dbXfCwT for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0924E12B0A0 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [98.245.40.52]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FA7A416BC; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:50:58 -0600 (MDT)
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <147241625250.24476.13333521107304467910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a139f13c-9745-0d86-853b-d5d6b8c9124c@stpeter.im> <E1C65C7E-CDFF-40BC-AF01-B2F029B64E6E@nostrum.com> <931fcd90-11c8-0b58-b3ad-eb6e7be2557e@stpeter.im> <f12534a1-bdce-925f-3358-c22975dd3bbe@stpeter.im> <512b8d52-68e1-2bdd-d153-20e24fbb73de@stpeter.im> <B197ACCC-5DB0-4C8F-8C54-1159A89B1796@nostrum.com> <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im> <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <76151e8b-9abf-7587-c36d-e2bf38180245@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:50:33 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/I19jHfqQsluy87b53WzmoGz1s6g>
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:50:36 -0000

On 9/7/16 2:47 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:45, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> Definite improvements. Would you like me to submit a revised I-D? Easy
>> enough. :-)
>
> If you agree to the changes, please do.

Submitting now.

> Am I correct to assume that
> there are no more outstanding issues?

That's how I see it.

> If so, I think we can take that
> version to IETF last call.

Great! The document shepherd might need to update his writeup.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email