Re: [Stox] Comments on draft-ietf-stox-presence-00

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 01 August 2013 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9B821F867B for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.268, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-fsLglyTW7B for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EBC21F8F2E for <stox@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-1-187.cisco.com (unknown [198.135.0.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53356E831E; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:03:37 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51FA07BE.8040709@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:01:18 +0200
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Lundberg <michaellundberg.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CANVDpGHNdp47OHbB6mAFVjaO2bx1Jtv53fukmOKK14KXYb7c5g@mail.gmail.com> <51EF4531.6090902@stpeter.im> <CANVDpGGUTtiT9Rh6vQMKiB88oQ3JJ6+qGTYnw5U2Uuwz6QFjXA@mail.gmail.com> <51F29BF9.3070506@stpeter.im> <51F648BE.3040004@stpeter.im> <CANVDpGHb6m1=bvBwstKqvw5KyKgFHb2kvaS8Czgb30Vvh1yFyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANVDpGHb6m1=bvBwstKqvw5KyKgFHb2kvaS8Czgb30Vvh1yFyw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Comments on draft-ietf-stox-presence-00
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:01:37 -0000

On 8/1/13 3:17 AM, Michael Lundberg wrote:
>  Peter,
> 
> The suggest text below makes sense to me.  In my opinion, this helps
> more clearly defining the presence mapping from XMPP to SIP for values
> such as 'away'.
> 
> I think there needs to be similar text for the second table (currently
> labeled Table 6), which states that the gateway SHOULD map the <show
> xmlns='jabber:client'> element in the PIDF XML to the <show/> element
> in the XMPP presence stanza.  This would only be for SIP clients that
> support that particular namespace, but it at least provides a
> recommended mapping in the opposite direction for clients that do
> support that namespace.

Yes, I think I already expressed agreement with that intent, so you'll
definitely see text about it in the next version of the spec (if no one
objects on the list, of course).

Peter