IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] Comments on draft-ietf-stox-presence-00

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 01 August 2013 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9B821F867B for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.268, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-fsLglyTW7B for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EBC21F8F2E for <stox@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-1-187.cisco.com (unknown [198.135.0.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53356E831E; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:03:37 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51FA07BE.8040709@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:01:18 +0200
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Lundberg <michaellundberg.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CANVDpGHNdp47OHbB6mAFVjaO2bx1Jtv53fukmOKK14KXYb7c5g@mail.gmail.com> <51EF4531.6090902@stpeter.im> <CANVDpGGUTtiT9Rh6vQMKiB88oQ3JJ6+qGTYnw5U2Uuwz6QFjXA@mail.gmail.com> <51F29BF9.3070506@stpeter.im> <51F648BE.3040004@stpeter.im> <CANVDpGHb6m1=bvBwstKqvw5KyKgFHb2kvaS8Czgb30Vvh1yFyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANVDpGHb6m1=bvBwstKqvw5KyKgFHb2kvaS8Czgb30Vvh1yFyw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Comments on draft-ietf-stox-presence-00
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:01:37 -0000

On 8/1/13 3:17 AM, Michael Lundberg wrote:
>  Peter,
> 
> The suggest text below makes sense to me.  In my opinion, this helps
> more clearly defining the presence mapping from XMPP to SIP for values
> such as 'away'.
> 
> I think there needs to be similar text for the second table (currently
> labeled Table 6), which states that the gateway SHOULD map the <show
> xmlns='jabber:client'> element in the PIDF XML to the <show/> element
> in the XMPP presence stanza.  This would only be for SIP clients that
> support that particular namespace, but it at least provides a
> recommended mapping in the opposite direction for clients that do
> support that namespace.

Yes, I think I already expressed agreement with that intent, so you'll
definitely see text about it in the next version of the spec (if no one
objects on the list, of course).

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email