IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] My review on draft-ietf-stox-7284bis

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Tue, 17 March 2015 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811141A6FEF for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rXyjHl2LTbiR for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072321A1BCF for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcqo1 with SMTP id qo1so28199389igc.0 for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=22+ZjUgxOdse2RL8fTBDk1aJ3qyZx6q4uqYCj86LsJw=; b=XfqSx0KtRxeB+aCDYl63SW8ueKt/4CXNHzAcuP1yEyOH2w1pzt7MeAzXbEs4YFaDF2 4f3jvCC3O0GMIjfm7rYiHGOhRWSexxXUZniyBiIBxJgVa9YfE8q97tdBznG7EyvURSnt f/JK1VwhKZ94UmmiN94iMuSABqtKl/u9vT6b3NJorcCf5LF8aoPvfHPSbAAAHoiGQ/lS ISMO3I3kP6odhw0Aahd5c70SZjRGlmJPKX8bzW1q0yFIU1eKIvRYE9Jr+fSlDT09xzst JZfitqKhvofDwlxQjSX2l0oYlSd0miEB0uu30TxIlmR9vnxoJhciZxqwghFuMw02nmpZ ApUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlL5uBkQPgUjZ83+KwwwcA15D1AlIMaYU4wMAuP8b9LiYL4s+jDes8HEqMbT8qKPHKZhEPb
X-Received: by 10.42.167.8 with SMTP id q8mr90452636icy.94.1426634425390; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm382740ige.6.2015.03.17.16.20.24 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5508B6B7.3070600@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:20:23 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Sa=FAl_Ibarra_Corretg=E9?= <saul@ag-projects.com>, stox@ietf.org
References: <AFA60318-E0A3-4BA2-BCFB-FD0F0685E44D@ag-projects.com> <5508AC63.7020405@andyet.net>
In-Reply-To: <5508AC63.7020405@andyet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/O6F4vFhS7_P2Bj_8myan1KONb0Q>
Subject: Re: [Stox] My review on draft-ietf-stox-7284bis
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 23:20:27 -0000

On 3/17/15 4:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
> Hi Saúl, thanks for the review.
>
> On 3/13/15 10:04 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:

<snip/>

>> Section 4.3.3
>>
>> Point 2 it’s not very clear to me, upon receiving the SUBSCRIBE
>> request with Expires 0, there is no need to send it again.
>
> This is from the XMPP server (via the gateway), not from the SIP user to
> the XMPP user, in order to cancel the subscription in the other
> direction from what's shown in Example 16. Do you feel this isn't
> necessary?

I looked at this more closely and you're right.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email