Re: [Stox] chat issues

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 20 August 2013 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DF611E8141 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bqGlAVzAUX7b for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC5F11E80E8 for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id EyzL1m0080ldTLk51BsHHe; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:52:17 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FBsG1m01M3ZTu2S01BsG0A; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:52:17 +0000
Message-ID: <52140130.9090300@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:52:16 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stox@ietf.org
References: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A07605C@008-AM1MPN1-042.mgdnok.nokia.com> <5213F23E.5050802@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <5213F23E.5050802@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1377042737; bh=Nr7zjMH4QFfblOm0iYPDlClFaExGcvn3TVGi/XlBZQ0=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=OlgpQ4jLKgnCAva/yseIOGkBoWfom1zvx1WHrTC4YzYTGFQjEz2VR0MkC2PcGsQo5 4VkGbgd0npY/G8iW/PJgApLeWw3Bd/cwpGD3T1QDVHItELNIdrDmDSn9krI4oj7FKr 5id+rVmEoZIEaqje/2TLt/pNlgX0zMz4sbA3S2/NuC7q5/HF9a9YdwPmOCt/b155yW ZS+/iVCNYzNxE2HdnYJb+aiM8Dmp4lY0g7hMSbSFm8HdnKILkoFjz6DEZoxLQJ4Srw ObNusHtf1GJnSln+lGrFIPYMX5JrjHnHIzwVnBc5+o1wFLSV8ByIyDy1MxcifI3H2a kGdpQAqVOfuwg==
Subject: Re: [Stox] chat issues
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:52:24 -0000

On 8/20/13 6:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 8/14/13 1:19 PM, Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> * Chat
>>
>> - Issue: Mapping between XMPP ChatStates (XEP-0085) and isComposing event (RFC 3994).
>> - Issue: Mapping between message receipts (XEP-0184) and MSRP REPORT chunks (RFC 4975).
>> - Consider if the above two are included or possibly split into a forthcoming advanced-chat draft.
>
> The sense of the room that I perceived was to map the first but not the
> second, since I don't think there's a critical mass of XEP-0184
> implementations out there in the world. However, I'd be open to defining
> the receipt/chunk mapping in more of an informational way in the
> stox-chat spec.
>
> What do other folks think?
>
>> - Issue: Draft says gateway determines MSRP is supported before sending INVITE. How?
>
> SIP OPTIONS...?

Don't go there - its a bad plan.
There is no reasonable way to know in advance.

	Thanks,
	Paul