IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] Extended WGLC for draft-ietf-stox-groupchat-04 [was: WGLC for draft-ietf-stox-groupchat-04]

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 10 June 2014 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7954E1A0336 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L3pNfo9AoFDY for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87CB1A032E for <stox@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.184.175]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4FB540A26; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 19:47:50 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <539663C6.7000508@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:47:50 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <0E1BD27E-E0B5-4B61-8451-5B3ED8B649A2@jitsi.org> <DA536B73-D11A-40AD-901B-1428BC7376E1@jitsi.org> <5C094162-79EC-47AA-8861-1DC2F19E96E8@nostrum.com> <53852400.2070704@stpeter.im> <C4B94AC1-B364-49E7-853A-FB7362A65DE7@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4B94AC1-B364-49E7-853A-FB7362A65DE7@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/VQyV6W_ilNI259jH_rOJZjVurSE
Cc: stox@ietf.org, Yana Stamcheva <yana@jitsi.org>
Subject: Re: [Stox] Extended WGLC for draft-ietf-stox-groupchat-04 [was: WGLC for draft-ietf-stox-groupchat-04]
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:47:53 -0000

Honing in on one point for the moment...

On 6/6/14, 2:23 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2014, at 6:47 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben, thanks for the feedback! Comments inline.
>>
>> On 5/2/14, 2:44 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

<snip/>

>>> Also,
>>> MSRP requests should not traverse a SIP server (unless it is also an
>>> MSRP relay.)
>>
>> I am not familiar enough with typical MSRP deployments to know if this is usually the case.
>>
>
> While someone might co-locate them, they are separate logical functions. From an architectural perspective we should probably not mix SIP and MSRP across the same "box".

So the MSRP messages would be routed directly from the XMPP-to-MSRP 
gateway to the SIP user agent, right? And I take it that would apply to 
draft-ietf-stox-chat, too...

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email