Re: [Stox] Review on -presence

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sat, 03 August 2013 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6748021F9AFE for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 00:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.284, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGkANSfbHd9B for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 00:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406E821F9ADC for <stox@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 00:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bxb-vpn3-613.cisco.com (unknown [198.135.0.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4C3FE8328; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 01:56:26 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51FCB717.6080200@stpeter.im>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 09:53:59 +0200
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Sa=FAl_Ibarra_Corretg=E9?= <saul@ag-projects.com>
References: <0CB65FBA-7262-4189-8852-5FC08A34D50D@ag-projects.com> <51F99063.30203@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <51F99063.30203@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "stox@ietf.org" <stox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Stox] Review on -presence
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:54:09 -0000

On 8/1/13 12:32 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 7/30/13 5:33 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>> 
>> - Using ID-123kdklejd doesn't seem to work as a valid xs:ID, TID-1234
>> does work though, so we could use TID- as the prefix for tuple
>> identifiers in examples and such.
> 
> I will double-check that against the XML specification.

Hmm. Here is what I see in the XML schema datatype specification:

   The ·value space· of ID is the set of all strings that ·match· the
   NCName production in [Namespaces in XML].

Where the NCName production is defined as follows:

   NCName 	::= 	(Letter | '_') (NCNameChar)*

What software are you using for validation? I'm not seeing a constraint
that an xs:ID needs to begin with three letters.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/