IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id D17C41A0113; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:02:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04681A01D5 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:02:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KDhUYx_o5BB for <xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477931A00F0 for <draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igal13 with SMTP id l13so37999799iga.1 for <draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AL/1fX7naMXgomvFTb4QiraTM436r1uWdwI2aOwvb6A=; b=XFvhrd0eb8ZVzEC7Jcta0uSwVJ/4i/FQLum7LzLV0HQtpXwG+OtbtGS/qU9yk0nM0f 8yrRpEO6wHRBC7v7o8cwGNMtQ/yeBfbW38Fh6co+jOJF90V3g9Hx2ihHQYE/FkXZQxjO H6Ubu50NYQe0aak7QsLytLosLb/DWl0AqPA4vQuO4Jg12VlLDjtSxHHeep+3cjmNvM7b dMAaIstLdVoOlgjv5lmmpQRPkmcQ1I+ivsOWrZ3MInWp5b9MNphABjatjO8794WcEexL 2UYXC8v/3Losuq5gpmgko7T5Rh6RUr5/cg0kj/k6TIMlvUBbFtaGLRD3Tb4TPqIL+vAt CCCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn3zM+ifFszF0i81yATuE13oJ/sD4KWbiJ7MmdEYSt+vLMDflOLNzopYVtVVhgMf7/dhYwp
X-Received: by 10.107.5.212 with SMTP id 203mr16228139iof.4.1425513723718; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm11641100igs.0.2015.03.04.16.02.02 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F79CF9.2000001@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:02:01 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150304173650.13446.53810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150304173650.13446.53810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/bqVA8IGX9NpNyy35uTo3dG6zFik>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, yana@jitsi.org, stox-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:02:06 -0000

On 3/4/15 10:36 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> Pete Resnick has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stox-chat/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Looks good, but a question: Shouldn't F6 in section 4 and F18 in section
> 5 result in sending an XMPP Chat State Notification of "active" or
> "inactive" to the XMPP client? If so, adding that, and a discussion in
> section 6, seems useful.

Hm. Typically in Chat State Notifications, <active/> is sent along with 
a content message - so for example it would be sent with the messages at 
F11 in §4 and F24 in §5. Yes, it is possible to send what we call a 
"standalone notification", and that might make sense in this context as 
a way to flag the existence of a chat session between the parties. 
Adding a sentence about this possibility doesn't seem unreasonable...

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email