Re: [Stox] Review on -presence

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 16 August 2013 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCFD11E82C0 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfqMbUw45fps for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF87C11E8203 for <stox@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [24.8.129.242]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C841A414F7; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:07:42 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <520E85D3.8040404@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:04:35 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stox@ietf.org
References: <0CB65FBA-7262-4189-8852-5FC08A34D50D@ag-projects.com> <51F99063.30203@stpeter.im> <51FCC3C0.3040200@stpeter.im> <520BA7EC.6050604@alum.mit.edu> <520BC1A7.1030104@stpeter.im> <520BC2A0.4020703@alum.mit.edu> <520BCC35.2040909@stpeter.im> <B979C91A-14BB-42EC-AB7D-54066974039E@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <B979C91A-14BB-42EC-AB7D-54066974039E@ag-projects.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Stox] Review on -presence
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:04:45 -0000

On 8/16/13 2:17 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>>
>> OK, good. Here is proposed text for Section 3.3.2:
>>
>>   For as long as a SIP user is online and interested in receiving
>>   presence notifications from the XMPP users, the user's SIP user agent
>>   is responsible for periodically refreshing the subscription by
>>   sending an updated SUBSCRIBE request with an appropriate value for
>>   the Expires header.  In response, the SIMPLE-XMPP gateway SHOULD send
>>   a SIP NOTIFY to the user agent; if the gateway has meaningful
>>   information about the availability state of the XMPP user then the
>>   NOTIFY SHOULD communicate that information (e.g., by containing a
>>   PIDF body [RFC3863] with the relevant data), whereas if the gateway
>>   does not have meaningful information about the availability state of
>>   the XMPP user then the NOTIFY SHOULD be empty as allowed by
>>   [RFC3265].
>>
>> That would come before the existing discussion of handling by the
>> SIMPLE-XMPP gateway.
>>
> 
> Sounds good, I guess you'll just change the SHOULDs to MUSTs as pointed out by Paul.

Yes, that will be in the next version.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/