IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 04 March 2015 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB4E1A6F05; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 07:12:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XyFZ47dhVjVt; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 07:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6FD1A6F01; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 07:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17859BEBE; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:12:54 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8NJBMyPvYsTI; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:12:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [172.28.14.119] (unknown [193.242.192.25]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66E75BEB6; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:12:18 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54F720BE.5090609@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:11:58 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20150303204228.1780.23346.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJ+tva8rXkFy36h0+cSq0+sGkdoXcnZ-5dq4cmWb5qg7ag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+tva8rXkFy36h0+cSq0+sGkdoXcnZ-5dq4cmWb5qg7ag@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/gj7XD4EnwfrE4IRrg8DhKsvhoj8>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, Yana Stamcheva <yana@jitsi.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org, stox-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:12:59 -0000


On 04/03/15 13:34, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> - End of p12: "are suggested" is odd to see in an RFC, it
>> might be better if you find some other wording.
> 
> Why odd?  This doesn't affect interoperability, but somewhat affects
> user experience.  If I were implementing this, I would follow the
> suggestion.  If it turned out to be too hard, in my implementation, to
> do that, I'd do something else.  "We suggest these" seems exactly
> right here.

I've lost context, but iirc it says "here's a thing, we suggest
you do it, or maybe not" and gives no further guidance. If so,
that reads oddly but I'd have to go check and can't juts now.
It's fine to skip if I'm wrong.

S

> 
> Barry
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email