[Stox] Fwd: Re: Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 22 January 2014 19:07 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978AC1A01B7 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1EvFWwy9rmZW for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27E21A01AF for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-vpn-client-10-89-0-179.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CFD240067; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:07:22 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <52E016E9.4070206@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:07:21 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "stox@ietf.org" <stox@ietf.org>
References: <52E016D4.3010709@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <52E016D4.3010709@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <52E016D4.3010709@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Stox] Fwd: Re: Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:07:24 -0000
Forgot to reply to all. Peter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Stox] Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:07:00 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> And thanks for this review, too. On 12/24/13 1:57 PM, Mary Barnes wrote: > HI all, > > I've reviewed the document and believe it's ready to progress with a few > changes/minor nits fixed: > > 1) Section 3. The text related to F6 uses the term MSRP user agent. > That term isn't used at all in RFC 4975, in particular since an MSRP > user doesn't have to be a SIP User agent. I would suggest to just > reword as follows: > OLD > Romeo can then send a reply using his MSRP user agent. > NEW > Romeo can then send a reply using his MSRP client. Makes sense. > 2) Section 4. The numbered references to Fx are off by one starting > with Example 16:, which should be F7 and not F8. F9 should be F8 and > F10 should be F9. Good catch! > 3) Section 9. RFC 4975 should be referenced for security for MSRP > rather than RFC 3428. Yes. > 4) References. RFC 3428 should be removed as a reference as MSRP/RFC > 4975 is entirely independent of the MESSAGE/RFC 3428. You are right. There are also some stray words about SIMPLE instead of MSRP, so I'll fix those at the same time. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [Stox] Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat Mary Barnes
- [Stox] Fwd: Re: Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox… Peter Saint-Andre