[Stox] Fwd: Re: Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 22 January 2014 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978AC1A01B7 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1EvFWwy9rmZW for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27E21A01AF for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-vpn-client-10-89-0-179.cisco.com (unknown []) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CFD240067; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:07:22 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <52E016E9.4070206@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:07:21 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "stox@ietf.org" <stox@ietf.org>
References: <52E016D4.3010709@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <52E016D4.3010709@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <52E016D4.3010709@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Stox] Fwd: Re: Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:07:24 -0000

Forgot to reply to all.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Stox] Post-WGLC Review: draft-ietf-stox-chat
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:07:00 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>

And thanks for this review, too.

On 12/24/13 1:57 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> HI all,
> I've reviewed the document and believe it's ready to progress with a few
> changes/minor nits fixed:
> 1) Section 3.    The text related to F6 uses the term MSRP user agent.
> That term isn't used at all in RFC 4975, in particular since an MSRP
> user doesn't have to be a SIP User agent.  I would suggest to just
> reword as follows:
>    Romeo can then send a reply using his MSRP user agent.
>    Romeo can then send a reply using his MSRP client.

Makes sense.

> 2) Section 4.  The numbered references to Fx are off by one starting
> with Example 16:, which should be F7 and not F8.  F9 should be F8 and
> F10 should be F9. 

Good catch!

> 3) Section 9.  RFC 4975 should be referenced for security for MSRP
> rather than RFC 3428.  


> 4) References.  RFC 3428 should be removed as a reference as MSRP/RFC
> 4975 is entirely independent of the MESSAGE/RFC 3428.   

You are right.

There are also some stray words about SIMPLE instead of MSRP, so I'll
fix those at the same time.


Peter Saint-Andre