Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 13 September 2016 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF1212B561 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrJ7eqNc1-Mz for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0386512B488 for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 06:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.1.2] ([162.216.46.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u8DDdBPE082464 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:39:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [162.216.46.52] claimed to be [10.10.1.2]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "=?utf-8?q?Sa=C3=BAl?= Ibarra =?utf-8?q?Corretg=C3=A9?=" <saul@ag-projects.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:39:10 -0400
Message-ID: <BA18C029-198B-4853-A0BD-6832B1AB34D5@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <81A30B28-EEDE-4BF2-8BA1-7CD148DF7ECE@ag-projects.com>
References: <147241625250.24476.13333521107304467910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a139f13c-9745-0d86-853b-d5d6b8c9124c@stpeter.im> <E1C65C7E-CDFF-40BC-AF01-B2F029B64E6E@nostrum.com> <931fcd90-11c8-0b58-b3ad-eb6e7be2557e@stpeter.im> <f12534a1-bdce-925f-3358-c22975dd3bbe@stpeter.im> <512b8d52-68e1-2bdd-d153-20e24fbb73de@stpeter.im> <B197ACCC-5DB0-4C8F-8C54-1159A89B1796@nostrum.com> <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im> <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com> <76151e8b-9abf-7587-c36d-e2bf38180245@stpeter.im> <0C304BC3-0AD3-48C4-958B-AC44122892D7@nostrum.com> <5FA29740-BCD2-402D-BEB1-417A66CA7603@ag-projects.com> <81A30B28-EEDE-4BF2-8BA1-7CD148DF7ECE@ag-projects.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; markup=markdown
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5260)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/jUayycELW5jSBMVZgsMXdXOrjl0>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:10:53 -0000

Oops, I missed a comment:

On 12 Sep 2016, at 5:42, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:

> These are all quite minor things, I think we are good to go for WGLC 
> after small fixes for those.

The draft is currently in the AD Evaluation state, meaning that the WGLC 
has already completed and publication has been requested. Did you mean 
to say that we need to repeat the WGLC, or did you mean IETF last call?

There's probably enough changes that a repeat WGLC would be reasonable. 
OTOH, I am skeptical that the working group still has enough active 
participants for a repeated WGLC to add value.

Thanks!

Ben.