Re: [Stox] Review on -presence

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 8/14/13 8:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> OK, good. Here is proposed text for Section 3.3.2:
>
>     For as long as a SIP user is online and interested in receiving
>     presence notifications from the XMPP users, the user's SIP user agent
>     is responsible for periodically refreshing the subscription by
>     sending an updated SUBSCRIBE request with an appropriate value for
>     the Expires header.  In response, the SIMPLE-XMPP gateway SHOULD send

S/SHOULD/MUST/

I'm using RFC6665 as my reference, rather than 3265.
See section 4.2.1.2 - the NOTIFY is required.

	Thanks,
	Paul

>     a SIP NOTIFY to the user agent; if the gateway has meaningful
>     information about the availability state of the XMPP user then the
>     NOTIFY SHOULD communicate that information (e.g., by containing a
>     PIDF body [RFC3863] with the relevant data), whereas if the gateway
>     does not have meaningful information about the availability state of
>     the XMPP user then the NOTIFY SHOULD be empty as allowed by
>     [RFC3265].
>
> That would come before the existing discussion of handling by the
> SIMPLE-XMPP gateway.
>
> Peter
>