Re: [Stox] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 04 March 2015 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 01E651A0064; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:29:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58EF1A0069 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:29:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBxS4IctAQsm for <xfilter-draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428961A0064 for <draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igdh15 with SMTP id h15so41337160igd.3 for <draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:29:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UzWPhUHc3ZY8XRykDcVZso4hLwkVoepWji6XLJ0fguw=; b=LWGQ1DBdLhh98jtE/a7wjjlDXHwV19+yK6MQmiuQde9+1sq2AcRWHjKsiw+xUCbCna DYapVcRBoDUONAHh3LijmBFNtfiw5HSKR0hZZl+GIfw7AnWg5ch74QAJSYMfT8oW1oVU v+DQ0+o4NNhysdmp0z180oIuUhFjFz9jdsYUCX4nfI72/DP2087pezj/PH1BS4ZjvRaU sYEY9uzUjR8vMPhBZXgFHzR4IPNRzi+rPn7/fqhvyxf4Us255oWk05IPagpEOA3zl85t +u/zmxB3d/2JG/VZc5GWCb7MRQFPwqBC/IQxaf9YB4LfE8a0kunH7xXCr1M50nPxPGaF 7/KQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJjJWaXy1D2ZgSQdWYnpsI0RKCUUr0HzaszO5WzyR61WWuHnyy3Dq5xsK4d1I5PLwfop/t
X-Received: by 10.42.76.6 with SMTP id c6mr312619ick.52.1425511768709; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm11632375ign.12.2015.03.04.15.29.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F79556.8080404@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:29:26 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150302235838.3370.58562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150302235838.3370.58562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/pIt-GY0H9kApkJDCoid08atkAJo>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, yana@jitsi.org, stox-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-stox-chat.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:29:31 -0000

On 3/2/15 4:58 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-stox-chat-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stox-chat/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -- Section 1 --
>
>     In SIP-based systems that use MSRP, a chat session is formally
>     negotiated just as any other session type is using SIP.
>
> Nit: you need an appositive comma before "using SIP".

Or something. :-)

I'd prefer this:

    In SIP-based systems that use MSRP, a chat session is formally
    negotiated (just as any other session type is negotiated when using
    SIP).

> -- Section 6 --
>
>     Here the idle state indicates that the
>     sender is not actively composing a message, and the active state
>     indicates that the sender is indeed actively composing a message (the
>     sending client simply toggles between the two states, changing to
>     active if the user is actively composing a message and changing to
>     idle if the user is no longer actively composing a message).
>
> This really sounds repetitious (because the repeating sounds repetitious
> when it repeats).  I think you could end the parenthetical after "toggles
> between the two states", because you've really already said the rest.

Agreed.

> -- Section 11 --
> The second paragraph looks like it's exactly the same as what's added in
> stox-im, and that's a normative reference already.  Why not add a
> citation to the security considerations in stox-im, and delete the second
> paragraph, incorporating it by reference?

Makes sense.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/