Re: [Stox] review of core, chat, groupchat and presence

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 19 September 2013 03:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5010D11E8175 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.345
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.816, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwGWTboyhgzF for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE40311E80E9 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EC8B206F7; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:57:58 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <523A7520.70002@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:53:04 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stox@ietf.org
References: <5203E484.4050902@goodadvice.pages.de>
In-Reply-To: <5203E484.4050902@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Stox] review of core, chat, groupchat and presence
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:53:11 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/8/13 12:33 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote:

> chat: example f2: call-id: contain jid? how about uniqueness?. Is
> there any text on the use of <thread/>? in -im @example.com callid
> is used a=lang could be taken xml:lang? before example F4: the
> gateway acknowledges on behalf of juliet?
> 
> example f5: the initial message in F1 should have an id attribute
> which gets mapped in f5. Does a786hjs2 map to thread/call id?
> 
> example f6: shouldn't message-id should be different from f5? 
> mapping of message-id to id attribute, should be randomly generated
> if not present
> 
> section 4: sessinos -> sessions;

Sorry, I neglected to incorporate this feedback into version -01. I'll
do that for -02.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=YbBi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----