IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt

Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com> Tue, 13 September 2016 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <saul@ag-projects.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A5712B551 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SbphCWPQS8PH for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sipthor.net (node16.dns-hosting.info [81.23.228.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4129012B5DC for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (unknown [51.179.151.35]) by mail.sipthor.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 414A614AC06F; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7A37D1C-697D-454F-81AC-4CC6746652A3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
In-Reply-To: <BA18C029-198B-4853-A0BD-6832B1AB34D5@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:35:22 +0100
Message-Id: <40AD2CAA-5A5C-41FC-BB49-88F4DEFCD07B@ag-projects.com>
References: <147241625250.24476.13333521107304467910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a139f13c-9745-0d86-853b-d5d6b8c9124c@stpeter.im> <E1C65C7E-CDFF-40BC-AF01-B2F029B64E6E@nostrum.com> <931fcd90-11c8-0b58-b3ad-eb6e7be2557e@stpeter.im> <f12534a1-bdce-925f-3358-c22975dd3bbe@stpeter.im> <512b8d52-68e1-2bdd-d153-20e24fbb73de@stpeter.im> <B197ACCC-5DB0-4C8F-8C54-1159A89B1796@nostrum.com> <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im> <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com> <76151e8b-9abf-7587-c36d-e2bf38180245@stpeter.im> <0C304BC3-0AD3-48C4-958B-AC44122892D7@nostrum.com> <5FA29740-BCD2-402D-BEB1-417A66CA7603@ag-projects.com> <81A30B28-EEDE-4BF2-8BA1-7CD148DF7ECE@ag-projects.com> <BA18C029-198B-4853-A0BD-6832B1AB34D5@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/vuCLW9mot146c8286dIGKoTkxq8>
Cc: stox@ietf.org, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:02:53 -0000

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 14:39, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Oops, I missed a comment:
> 
> On 12 Sep 2016, at 5:42, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> 
>> These are all quite minor things, I think we are good to go for WGLC after small fixes for those.
> 
> The draft is currently in the AD Evaluation state, meaning that the WGLC has already completed and publication has been requested. Did you mean to say that we need to repeat the WGLC, or did you mean IETF last call?
> 
> There's probably enough changes that a repeat WGLC would be reasonable. OTOH, I am skeptical that the working group still has enough active participants for a repeated WGLC to add value.
> 

Sorry, wrong terminology :-) IETF last call.  These are not big structural changes, I don’t think we need another WGLC.


Cheers!

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email